A new standardized tool for quantification of closed-loop communication in trauma care: CAST Grid reliability study.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_2ECD3E36AE50
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A new standardized tool for quantification of closed-loop communication in trauma care: CAST Grid reliability study.
Périodique
Injury
ISSN
1879-0267 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0020-1383
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
54
Numéro
9
Pages
110851
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The CAST Grid has been developed to evaluate the use of closed-loop communication (CLC) in the trauma bay.
The CAST Grid and two validated non-technical team performance assessment tools (the TEAM and T-NOTECHS grids) were completed by 2 independent reviewers based on trauma care simulation videos from a French Level 1 trauma center. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were evaluated for CLC parameters and non-technical performance, and correlations between these parameters were analyzed.
The study analyzed 11 videos. The intra- and inter-rater agreement for the number of CLC per minute (CLC/min) was moderate and good, respectively, based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [95%CI] (0.57 [-0.40;0.94] and 0.77 [0.33;0.94]). However, the agreement was poor for the percentage of CLC (0.37 [-0.58;0.89] and -0.36 [-0.71;0.14], respectively). The study found that a lower number of CLC/min was correlated with an increased duration of the simulation (r = -0.75 [-0.93; -0.25]).
The CAST Grid showed a relatively good inter-rater agreement to quantify the number of CLC/min which was inversely correlated with the duration of care. This tool opens up the possibility of quantifying CLC and allows for new analyses of team functioning and interactions.
The CAST Grid and two validated non-technical team performance assessment tools (the TEAM and T-NOTECHS grids) were completed by 2 independent reviewers based on trauma care simulation videos from a French Level 1 trauma center. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were evaluated for CLC parameters and non-technical performance, and correlations between these parameters were analyzed.
The study analyzed 11 videos. The intra- and inter-rater agreement for the number of CLC per minute (CLC/min) was moderate and good, respectively, based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [95%CI] (0.57 [-0.40;0.94] and 0.77 [0.33;0.94]). However, the agreement was poor for the percentage of CLC (0.37 [-0.58;0.89] and -0.36 [-0.71;0.14], respectively). The study found that a lower number of CLC/min was correlated with an increased duration of the simulation (r = -0.75 [-0.93; -0.25]).
The CAST Grid showed a relatively good inter-rater agreement to quantify the number of CLC/min which was inversely correlated with the duration of care. This tool opens up the possibility of quantifying CLC and allows for new analyses of team functioning and interactions.
Mots-clé
Humans, Teach-Back Communication, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Care Team, Trauma Centers, Videotape Recording, Clinical Competence, Closed-loop communication, Simulation, Soft skills, Teamwork, Traumatology
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
23/06/2023 9:01
Dernière modification de la notice
14/12/2023 7:11