eHealth literacy measurement tools: a systematic review protocol.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 36151577_BIB_2DAEC6BE2B70.pdf (792.72 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_2DAEC6BE2B70
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
eHealth literacy measurement tools: a systematic review protocol.
Périodique
Systematic reviews
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Délétroz C., Allen M.C., Sasseville M., Rouquette A., Bodenmann P., Gagnon M.P.
ISSN
2046-4053 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2046-4053
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
24/09/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
205
Pages
9
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Improving eHealth literacy (eHL) is one of the biggest challenges currently facing the global healthcare community. Indeed the use of digital services has the potential to engage patients in care as well as improve the effectiveness of chronic disease self-management, it remains highly dependent on a patient's specific skills and experiences in the health care systems. Although eHealth literacy has gained momentum in the past decade, it remains an underresearched area, particularly eHealth literacy measurement. The aim of the review is to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of eHealth literacy for adult populations and to summarize the evidence on their psychometric properties.
We will conduct a systematic literature review of the tools used to measure eHealth literacy for adult population. The search strategy aims to find published studies. A three-step search strategy will be used in this review. Published studies will be searched in CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception until end. Grey literature will be searched to find theses. Database search strategies will be formulated and tested with the assistance of an expert Health Sciences Librarian. The selection of studies will be done by two independent reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through consensus, and a third reviewer will solve discrepancies. Furthermore, two reviewers will independently evaluate the methodological rigor of the instruments development and testing and assign a grade using the standardized Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Disagreements will be discussed with a third reviewer, expert in psychometrics. Extracted data will be aggregated and analyzed to produce a set of synthesized findings that will be used to develop evidence-informed recommendations in regard of eHL instruments. We will present a synthesis of all instruments, their psychometric properties, and make recommendations for eHL instrument selection in practice. Reporting will be informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and a PRISMA flow diagram.
This systematic review will summarize the evidence on the psychometric properties of PROMs instruments used to measure eHL and will help clinicians, managers, and policy-makers to select an appropriate instrument.
PROSPERO CRD42021232765.
Mots-clé
Adult, Checklist, Consensus, Humans, Literacy, Psychometrics, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Telemedicine, Health literacy, Systematic review, eHealth literacy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
29/09/2022 16:02
Dernière modification de la notice
23/01/2024 8:22
Données d'usage