Practice patterns of kidney stone management across European and non-European centers: an in-depth investigation from the European Renal Stone Network (ERSN).

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 32918723_BIB_25E50D484452.pdf (494.99 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_25E50D484452
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Practice patterns of kidney stone management across European and non-European centers: an in-depth investigation from the European Renal Stone Network (ERSN).
Périodique
Journal of nephrology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Ferraro P.M., Unwin R., Bonny O., Gambaro G.
ISSN
1724-6059 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1121-8428
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
08/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Numéro
4
Pages
1337-1346
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Kidney stones are a common condition in the general population, however, high-quality evidence for its management is scarce. We propose the creation of an international network with the aim of sharing practice patterns and patient data towards an improvement of our knowledge of the disease.
Cross-sectional survey.
An online survey was circulated through several scientific societies. Items were grouped into six domains. Each center's overall score (OS) was also calculated.
Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests were performed for differences across centers.
The countries that contributed most were Italy (8.6%), Turkey (6.6%), France and Spain (6.1%). Some type of nutritional work-up was implemented in 62% of centers. A DEXA scan was performed by 46% of centers, whereas some kind of acidification test was performed by 25% of centers. Most centers (80%) implemented blood investigations at least at baseline. With regard to 24-h urine exams, 7 out of 16 were performed by at least 50% of centers. Information on stone composition was collected by 58% of centers. The OS was significantly higher among higher-volume centers compared with lower-volume centers (p = 0.002). Significant differences between EU and non-EU centers were found.
Cross-sectional design; no validation on information.
Our survey highlights the potential for the creation of a network of centers that could share information in a common database for observational research and for enrollment of patients in interventional trials.
Mots-clé
Biomarkers, Bone mineral density, Epidemiology, Guidelines, Mineral metabolism, Nephrolithiasis
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
19/09/2020 13:48
Dernière modification de la notice
12/01/2022 8:08
Données d'usage