Fiblast (trafermin) in acute stroke: results of the European-Australian phase II/III safety and efficacy trial.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_24966
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Fiblast (trafermin) in acute stroke: results of the European-Australian phase II/III safety and efficacy trial.
Périodique
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bogousslavsky J., Victor S.J., Salinas E.O., Pallay A., Donnan G.A., Fieschi C., Kaste M., Orgogozo J.M., Chamorro A., Desmet A.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
European-Australian Fiblast (Trafermin) in Acute Stroke Group
ISSN
1015-9770 (Print)
ISSN-L
1015-9770
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2002
Volume
14
Numéro
3-4
Pages
239-251
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Trafermin (basic fibroblast growth factor) has been shown to reduce infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke models, and to promote functional recovery and new synapse formation when given to animals with completed cerebral infarction. A previous study in acute stroke patients suggested that trafermin was safe and well tolerated when given over a 3-hour period over a wide dose range.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial of a single 24-hour intravenous infusion of trafermin. Patients having onset of stroke symptoms within 6 h and a baseline score of >/=7 on the NIH Stroke Scale (>/=2 motor) were randomized to receive 5 or 10 mg of trafermin or placebo intravenously infused over 24 h. The primary efficacy outcome was a categorized combination of the Barthel and Rankin scales assessed at 90 days. A total of 286 patients had been enrolled at 55 sites in 11 countries when the sponsor directed that enrollment be stopped because an interim analysis of efficacy data predicted too small a chance of demonstrating a statistically significant benefit after recruitment of the planned 900 patients. The 5-mg group showed a slight but nonsignificant advantage over placebo (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.72-2.00, p = 0.48); the 10-mg group showed a nonsignificant disadvantage (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.22, p = 0.24). Mortality rates at 90 days were 17% in the 5-mg group, 24% in the 10-mg group and 18% in the placebo group. Treatment with trafermin was associated with an increased leukocytosis and a decrease in blood pressure: mean decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline was 19 mm Hg in the 5-mg group, 22 mm Hg in the 10-mg group and 8 mm Hg in the placebo group. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, patients in the 5-mg group treated more than 5 h after the onset of symptoms showed an apparent advantage over placebo (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.00-4.41, p = 0.044; after age adjustment: OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.91-4.13, p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: With the proper treatment regimen, trafermin can likely be given safely to stroke patients. The 5-mg dose showed a trend toward a treatment advantage. The ideal time window for this agent may exceed 5 h. This may open new avenues for acute stroke therapy, aiming at enhancing recovery mechanisms rather than immediate neuroprotection.
Mots-clé
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Fibroblast Growth Factors/administration & dosage, Fibroblast Growth Factors/adverse effects, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage, Peptide Fragments/adverse effects, Safety, Stroke/drug therapy, Stroke/physiopathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/11/2007 13:21
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:02
Données d'usage