Implementing advance care planning in early dementia care: results and insights from a pilot interventional trial.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_208C382A15CF
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Implementing advance care planning in early dementia care: results and insights from a pilot interventional trial.
Périodique
BMC geriatrics
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bosisio F., Sterie A.C., Rubli Truchard E., Jox R.J.
ISSN
1471-2318 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1471-2318
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
19/10/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
21
Numéro
1
Pages
573
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Advance care planning (ACP) is particularly appropriate for persons with early dementia (PWED) since it promotes conversations about dementia-specific illness scenarios, addresses inconsistencies between advance directives and patients' observed behavior, emphasizes prospective and relational autonomy, and may be generally consistent with older persons' decision-making needs. However, despite evidence of its benefits, ACP is yet to become widely used among PWED. In this paper, we present a dementia-specific tool developed in Western Switzerland, discuss results of a pilot trial designed to promote ACP among PWED and their relatives, and discuss the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and the study protocol in prevision of a large scale trial.
This one-arm pre-post pilot trial consisted of four visits, with visits 2 and 3 being the ACP intervention. Quantitative outcome measures during visit 1 and 4 assessed the aptitude of the intervention to support PWED autonomy and relatives' knowledge of PWED's preferences. Feasibility was explored according to how the recruitment procedure unfurled and based on the necessary revisions to the study protocol and healthcare providers' reason for excluding a PWED from the study. Acceptability was assessed according to pre-post evaluations, difficulties regarding the intervention or trial participation, and pre-post qualitative interviews regarding participants' reasons to participate to the study, satisfaction with the tool and difficulties perceived.
The ACP intervention itself was well received by PWED and their relatives that expressed satisfaction with the procedure, especially regarding the opportunity to discuss a sensitive topic with the help of a facilitator. Five main challenges in terms of feasibility were 1) to locate eligible patients, 2) to tailor recruitment procedures to recruitment locations, 3) to adapt inclusion criteria to clinical routines, 4) to engage PWED and their relatives in ACP, and 5) to design a trial that does not burden PWED. Despite these challenges, the intervention increased the number of advance directives, the concordance between PWED's preferences and relatives' decision on their behalf, and relatives' perceived control over healthcare decisions.
Misconceptions about dementia and ACP, in the patient, relatives, and healthcare providers, combined with structural and institutional challenges, have the power to impede research and implementation of ACP in dementia care. For this reason, we conclude that a large scale trial to test a dementia-specific tool of ACP is currently not feasible in Western Switzerland and should be endorsed in a systemic approach of ACP.
This trial was registered in the database clinicaltrial.gov with the number NCT03615027 .
Mots-clé
Advance Care Planning, Advance Directives, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Dementia/diagnosis, Dementia/therapy, Humans, Prospective Studies, Acceptability, Advance care planning, Alzheimer’s disease, Dementia, Feasibility, Goals of care, Trial
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
25/10/2021 8:22
Dernière modification de la notice
09/11/2021 6:40
Données d'usage