How Experts Gain Influence
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_1B9F61F9CBB5
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
How Experts Gain Influence
Périodique
Harvard Business Review
ISSN
0017-8012
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
07/2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
91
Numéro
7/8
Pages
70-74
Langue
anglais
Résumé
n theory, the risk management groups of two British banks-Saxon and Anglo had the same influence in their organizations. But in practice, they did not: Saxon's was engaged in critical work throughout the bank, while Anglo's had little visibility outside its areas of expertise.
In their study of these two financial institutions, the authors identified four competencies trailblazing, toolmaking, teamwork, and translation that help functional leaders or groups compete for top management's limited attention and increase their impact.
Anglo's risk managers were strong in only some of the competencies, but Saxon's were strong in all four. They consistently scanned the internal and external environment for important issues to which they could apply a risk management perspective (trailblazing) and then developed tools such as quarterly risk reports that spread their expertise (toolmaking). While controlling the tools' design and implementation, the risk managers incorporated business managers' insights (teamwork) and made sure everyone could understand the findings (translation).
Ultimately, experts' roles must fit the organization's strategy and structural needs. In some situations, functional experts can raise their profile by cultivating just two of the competencies. But those who are strong in all four are likely to be the most influential.
In their study of these two financial institutions, the authors identified four competencies trailblazing, toolmaking, teamwork, and translation that help functional leaders or groups compete for top management's limited attention and increase their impact.
Anglo's risk managers were strong in only some of the competencies, but Saxon's were strong in all four. They consistently scanned the internal and external environment for important issues to which they could apply a risk management perspective (trailblazing) and then developed tools such as quarterly risk reports that spread their expertise (toolmaking). While controlling the tools' design and implementation, the risk managers incorporated business managers' insights (teamwork) and made sure everyone could understand the findings (translation).
Ultimately, experts' roles must fit the organization's strategy and structural needs. In some situations, functional experts can raise their profile by cultivating just two of the competencies. But those who are strong in all four are likely to be the most influential.
Web of science
Création de la notice
18/08/2014 9:37
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 12:52