Pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without tension-free vaginal tape in women with occult or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence: a randomised controlled trial.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_1B3DAE6F29AE
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without tension-free vaginal tape in women with occult or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence: a randomised controlled trial.
Périodique
International Urogynecology Journal
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Schierlitz L., Dwyer P.L., Rosamilia A., De Souza A., Murray C., Thomas E., Hiscock R., Achtari C.
ISSN
1433-3023 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0937-3462
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
25
Numéro
1
Pages
33-40
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublishDocument Type: Article; Proceedings Paper
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: We set out to determine if insertion of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) sling at the time of pelvic organ prolapse surgery improves continence outcomes in women with pre-operative occult stress incontinence (OSI) or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).
METHODS: We conducted a randomised controlled study of prolapse surgery with or without a TVT midurethral sling. The pre- and post-operative assessment at 6 months included history, physical examination and urodynamic testing. Quality of life (QOL) and treatment success was assessed with the UDI-6 SF, IIQ-7 SF and a numerical success score. The primary outcome was symptomatic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) requiring continence surgery (TVT) at 6 months. Long-term follow-up continued to a minimum of 24 months. Secondary outcomes were quality of life parameters.
RESULTS: Eighty women received prolapse surgery alone (n = 43) or prolapse surgery with concurrent TVT (n = 37). Six months following prolapse surgery 3 out of 43 (7 %) patients in the no TVT group requested sling surgery compared with 0 out of 37 (0 %) in the TVT group (ARR 7 % [95 %CI: 3 to 19 %], p = 0.11). After 24 months there was one further participant in the no TVT group who received a TVT for treatment of SUI compared with none in the TVT group (4 out of 43, 9.3 % versus 0 out of 37; ARR 9.3 % [95 %CI: -1 to 22 %], p = 0.06). Both groups showed improvement in QOL difference scores for within-group analysis, without difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: These results support a policy that routine insertion of a sling in women with OSI at the time of prolapse repair is questionable and should be subject to shared decision-making between clinician and patient.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
24/01/2014 19:36
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:52
Données d'usage