Respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients: a critical review and pooled analysis of clinical studies.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_1732F4C2E0DC
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients: a critical review and pooled analysis of clinical studies.
Périodique
American Journal of Transplantation
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Vu D.L., Bridevaux P.O., Aubert J.D., Soccal P.M., Kaiser L.
ISSN
1600-6143 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1600-6135
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Volume
11
Numéro
5
Pages
1071-1078
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Lung transplant recipients present an increased risk for severe complications associated with respiratory infections. We conducted a review of the literature examining the clinical relationship between viral respiratory infection and graft complications. Thirty-four studies describing the clinical impact of influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza, human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, enterovirus, coronavirus, bocavirus or adenovirus were identified. The detection rate of respiratory viral infection ranged from 1.4% to 60%. Viruses were detected five times more frequently when respiratory symptoms were present [odds ratio (OR) = 4.97; 95% CI = 2.11-11.68]. Based on available observations, we could not observe an association between respiratory viral infection and acute rejection (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.41-4.43). We found a pooled incidence of 18% (9/50) of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in virus-positive cases compared to 11.6% (37/319) in virus-negative cases; however, limited number of BOS events did not allow to confirm the association. Our review confirms a causal relationship between respiratory viruses and respiratory symptoms, but cannot confirm a link between respiratory viruses and acute lung rejection. This is related in part to the heterogeneity and limitations of available studies. The link with BOS needs also to be reassessed in appropriate prospective studies.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
30/05/2011 9:30
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:46
Données d'usage