Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: ijerph-18-07945-v2.pdf (868.57 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_16FA8A871EB7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review.
Périodique
International journal of environmental research and public health
Auteur⸱e⸱s
D'Ecclesiis O., Caini S., Martinoli C., Raimondi S., Gaiaschi C., Tosti G., Queirolo P., Veneri C., Saieva C., Gandini S., Chiocca S.
ISSN
1660-4601 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1660-4601
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
27/07/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Numéro
15
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development and the prognostic and predictive factors for survival, stratifying for both sex and gender.
We conducted a systematic review of studies indexed in PUB-MED, EMBASE, and Scopus until 4 February 2021. We included reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses investigating differences between women and men in CM risk factors and in prognostic and predictive factors for CM survival.
Twenty-four studies were included, and relevant data extracted. Of these, 13 studies concerned potential risk factors, six concerned predictive factors, and five addressed prognostic factors of melanoma.
The systematic review revealed no significant differences in genetic predisposition to CM between males and females, while there appear to be several gender disparities regarding CM risk factors, partly attributable to different lifestyles and behavioral habits between men and women. There is currently no clear evidence of whether the mutational landscapes of CM differ by sex/gender. Prognosis is justified by a complex combination of phenotypes and immune functions, while reported differences between genders in predicting the effectiveness of new treatments are inconsistent. Overall, the results emerging from the literature reveal the importance of considering the sex/gender variable in all studies and pave the way for including it towards precision medicine.
Men and women differ genetically, biologically, and by social construct. Our systematic review shows that, although fundamental, the variable sex/gender is not among the ones collected and analyzed.
Mots-clé
Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma/epidemiology, Melanoma/genetics, Mutation, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology, Skin Neoplasms/genetics, gender, melanoma, meta-analysis, precision medicine, predictive factors, prognostic factors, risk factors, sex, systematic review
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
06/09/2021 9:41
Dernière modification de la notice
23/02/2022 8:08
Données d'usage