Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid-filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 32077561_BIB_1604895071AA.pdf (1779.11 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_1604895071AA
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid-filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications.
Périodique
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Johnson D.T., Fournier S., Kirkeeide R.L., De Bruyne B., Gould K.L., Johnson N.P.
ISSN
1522-726X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1522-1946
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/09/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
96
Numéro
3
Pages
E268-E277
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
We sought to develop an automatic method for correcting common errors in phasic pressure tracings for physiology-guided interventions on coronary and valvular stenosis.
Effective coronary and valvular interventions rely on accurate hemodynamic assessment. Phasic (subcycle) indexes remain intrinsic to valvular stenosis and are emerging for coronary stenosis. Errors, corrections, and clinical implications of fluid-filled catheter phasic pressure assessments have not been assessed in the current era of ubiquitous, high-fidelity pressure wire sensors.
We recruited patients undergoing invasive coronary physiology assessment. Phasic aortic pressure signals were recorded simultaneously using a fluid-filled guide catheter and 0.014″ pressure wire before and after standard calibration as well as after pullback. We included additional subjects undergoing hemodynamic assessment before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Using the pressure wire as reference standard, we developed an automatic algorithm to match phasic pressures.
Removing pressure offset and temporal shift produced the largest improvements in root mean square (RMS) error between catheter and pressure wire signals. However, further optimization <1 mmHg RMS error was possible by accounting for differential gain and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid-filled guide. The impact of correction was larger for subcycle (like systole or diastole) versus whole-cycle metrics, indicating a key role for valvular stenosis and emerging coronary pressure ratios.
When calibrating phasic aortic pressure signals using a pressure wire, correction requires these parameters: offset, timing, gain, and oscillations (frequency and damping factor). Automatically eliminating common errors may improve some clinical decisions regarding physiology-based intervention.
Mots-clé
aortic stenosis, fractional flow reserve, pressure hemodynamics
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
27/02/2020 17:00
Dernière modification de la notice
15/01/2021 8:08
Données d'usage