Robust discrimination between EEG responses to categories of environmental sounds in early coma.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_11B99A7AD615.P001.pdf (1010.22 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_11B99A7AD615
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Robust discrimination between EEG responses to categories of environmental sounds in early coma.
Périodique
Frontiers in Psychology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Cossy N., Tzovara A., Simonin A., Rossetti A.O., De Lucia M.
ISSN
1664-1078 (Electronic)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Volume
5
Numéro
155
Pages
1-13
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: epublish
Résumé
Humans can recognize categories of environmental sounds, including vocalizations produced by humans and animals and the sounds of man-made objects. Most neuroimaging investigations of environmental sound discrimination have studied subjects while consciously perceiving and often explicitly recognizing the stimuli. Consequently, it remains unclear to what extent auditory object processing occurs independently of task demands and consciousness. Studies in animal models have shown that environmental sound discrimination at a neural level persists even in anesthetized preparations, whereas data from anesthetized humans has thus far provided null results. Here, we studied comatose patients as a model of environmental sound discrimination capacities during unconsciousness. We included 19 comatose patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) during the first 2 days of coma, while recording nineteen-channel electroencephalography (EEG). At the level of each individual patient, we applied a decoding algorithm to quantify the differential EEG responses to human vs. animal vocalizations as well as to sounds of living vocalizations vs. man-made objects. Discrimination between vocalization types was accurate in 11 patients and discrimination between sounds from living and man-made sources in 10 patients. At the group level, the results were significant only for the comparison between vocalization types. These results lay the groundwork for disentangling truly preferential activations in response to auditory categories, and the contribution of awareness to auditory category discrimination.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
19/03/2014 13:04
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 12:39
Données d'usage