Barriers and facilitators to implementation of point-of-care lung ultrasonography in a tertiary centre in Benin: a qualitative study among general physicians and pneumologists.
Détails
Télécharger: 37369423_BIB_0F3E426603C0.pdf (1111.47 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_0F3E426603C0
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of point-of-care lung ultrasonography in a tertiary centre in Benin: a qualitative study among general physicians and pneumologists.
Périodique
BMJ open
ISSN
2044-6055 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-6055
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
26/06/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
13
Numéro
6
Pages
e070765
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Owing to its ease-of-use and excellent diagnostic performance for the assessment of respiratory symptoms, point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LUS) has emerged as an attractive skill in resource-low settings, where limited access to specialist care and inconsistent radiology services erode health equity.To narrow down the research to practice gap, this study aims to gain in-depth insights in the perceptions on POC-LUS and computer-assisted POC-LUS for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in a low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) of sub-Saharan Africa.
Qualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews with three pneumologists and five general physicians in a tertiary centre for pneumology and tuberculosis in Benin, West Africa. The center hosts a prospective cohort study on the diagnostic performance of POC-LUS for LRTI. In this context, all participants started a POC-LUS training programme 6 months before the current study. Transcripts were coded by the interviewer, checked for intercoder reliability by an independent psychologist, compared and thematically summarised according to grounded theory methods.
Various barriers- and facilitators+ to POC-LUS implementation were identified related to four principal categories: (1) hospital setting (eg, lack of resources for device renewal or maintenance-, need for POC tests+), (2) physician's perceptions (eg, lack of opportunity to practice-, willingness to appropriate the technique+), (3) tool characteristics (eg, unclear lifespan-, expedited diagnosis+) and (4) patient's experience (no analogous image to keep-, reduction in costs+). Furthermore, all interviewees had positive attitudes towards computer-assisted POC-LUS.
There is a clear need for POC affordable lung imaging techniques in LMIC and physicians are willing to implement POC-LUS to optimise the diagnostic approach of LRTI with an affordable tool. Successful integration of POC-LUS into clinical routine will require adequate responses to local challenges related to the lack of available maintenance resources and limited opportunity to supervised practice for physicians.
Qualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews with three pneumologists and five general physicians in a tertiary centre for pneumology and tuberculosis in Benin, West Africa. The center hosts a prospective cohort study on the diagnostic performance of POC-LUS for LRTI. In this context, all participants started a POC-LUS training programme 6 months before the current study. Transcripts were coded by the interviewer, checked for intercoder reliability by an independent psychologist, compared and thematically summarised according to grounded theory methods.
Various barriers- and facilitators+ to POC-LUS implementation were identified related to four principal categories: (1) hospital setting (eg, lack of resources for device renewal or maintenance-, need for POC tests+), (2) physician's perceptions (eg, lack of opportunity to practice-, willingness to appropriate the technique+), (3) tool characteristics (eg, unclear lifespan-, expedited diagnosis+) and (4) patient's experience (no analogous image to keep-, reduction in costs+). Furthermore, all interviewees had positive attitudes towards computer-assisted POC-LUS.
There is a clear need for POC affordable lung imaging techniques in LMIC and physicians are willing to implement POC-LUS to optimise the diagnostic approach of LRTI with an affordable tool. Successful integration of POC-LUS into clinical routine will require adequate responses to local challenges related to the lack of available maintenance resources and limited opportunity to supervised practice for physicians.
Mots-clé
Humans, Point-of-Care Systems, Benin, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography/methods, General Practitioners, Lung, Respiratory Tract Infections, Qualitative Research, Tropical medicine, Ultrasound
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
03/07/2023 14:39
Dernière modification de la notice
25/01/2024 7:31