Biasplot: A package to effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies
Détails
Etat: Public
Version: Author's accepted manuscript
ID Serval
serval:BIB_0F2E86D7E248
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Biasplot: A package to effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies
Périodique
Stata Journal
ISSN
1536-867X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
17
Numéro
1
Pages
208-221
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Bland and Altman’s (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taff ́e (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taffé: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taffé method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.
Mots-clé
gr0068, biasplot, limits of agreement, differential bias, proportional bias, Bland-Altman's plot, method comparison, measurement, empirical Bayes, BLUP
Web of science
Création de la notice
21/11/2017 12:48
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:35