Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: REF.pdf (351.71 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_0E8AC1007E27
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units
Périodique
International Journal For Quality In Health Care : Journal of the International Society For Quality In Health Care
Auteur⸱e⸱s
De Giorgi I., Fonzo-Christe C., Cingria L., Caredda B., Meyer V., Pfister R.E., Bonnabry P.
ISSN
1464-3677 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1353-4505
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2010
Volume
22
Numéro
3
Pages
170-178
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To analyse safety risks in injectable medications. To assess the potential impact and pharmacoeconomic aspects of safety tools.
DESIGN: The injectable drug process was prospectively assessed using a failure modes, effects and criticality analysis. Criticality indexes were estimated based on their likelihood of occurrence, detection probability and potential severity. The impact of 10 safety tools on the criticality index was calculated and extrapolated to all drugs injected daily. Yearly costs for a reduction in criticality by 1 point (=1 quali) per day were estimated.
SETTING: Paediatric and neonatal intensive care units in a University Hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Two paediatric nurses, a neonatologist, three hospital pharmacists.
INTERVENTIONS: Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure modes, criticality indexes, cost-efficacy ratios.
RESULTS: Thirty-one failure modes identified, with the mean of their entire criticality indexes totalling 4540. The most critical failure mode was microbial contamination. The following gains were predicted: 1292 quali (46 500 per day by extrapolation) from ready-to-use syringes, 1201 (72 060) by employing a clinical pharmacist, 996 (59 780) from double check by nurses and 984 (59 040) with computerized physician order entry. The best cost-efficacy ratios were obtained for a clinical pharmacist (1 quali = 0.54 euros), double check (1 quali = 0.71 euros) and ready-to-use syringes (1 quali = 0.72 euros). Computerized physician order entry showed the worst cost-efficacy ratio due to a very high investment costs (1 quali = 22.47 euros).
CONCLUSION: Based on our risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses, clinical pharmacy and ready-to-use syringes appear as the most promising safety tools.
Mots-clé
Hospitals, University/organization & administration, Injections/adverse effects, Injections/economics, Injections/methods, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/economics, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/organization & administration, Medication Errors/economics, Medication Errors/prevention & control, Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics, Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration, Safety Management/economics, Safety Management/organization & administration
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
13/07/2018 10:00
Dernière modification de la notice
14/02/2022 8:53
Données d'usage