Prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a realistic goal?

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_0C827CD97F47
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a realistic goal?
Périodique
Epilepsia
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Ryvlin P., Nashef L., Tomson T.
ISSN
1528-1167 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0013-9580
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2013
Volume
54 Suppl 2
Pages
23-8
Langue
anglais
Notes
Ryvlin, Philippe
Nashef, Lina
Tomson, Torbjorn
eng
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Epilepsia. 2013 May;54 Suppl 2:23-8. doi: 10.1111/epi.12180.
Résumé
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) represents one of the most severe consequences of drug-resistant epilepsy, for which no evidence-based prevention is available. Development of effective prevention will depend on the following: (1) better understanding of the pathophysiology of SUDEP to define the most appropriate targets of intervention, and (2) identification of risk factors for SUDEP that would allow for the design of feasible clinical trials to test targeted interventions in high-risk populations. The most important known risk factor is the occurrence and frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS), a seizure type that triggers the majority of witnessed SUDEP. Therefore, one likely way to prevent SUDEP is to minimize the risk of GTCS with optimal medical management and patient education. However, whether one might prevent SUDEP in patients with refractory epilepsy by using more frequent review of antiepileptic treatment and earlier referral for presurgical evaluation, remains to be seen. Another hypothetical strategy to prevent SUDEP is to reduce the risk of GTCS-induced postictal respiratory distress. This might be achieved by using lattice pillow, providing nocturnal supervision, reinforcing interictal serotoninergic tone, and lowering opiate- or adenosine-induced postictal brainstem depression. Promising interventions can be tested first on surrogate markers, such as postictal hypoxia in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs), before SUDEP trials can be implemented. EMU safety should also be improved to avoid SUDEP occurrence in that setting. Finally, the development of ambulatory SUDEP prevention devices should be encouraged but raises a number of unsolved issues.
Mots-clé
Anticonvulsants/*therapeutic use, Death, Sudden/*epidemiology/*prevention & control, Epilepsy/diagnosis/*mortality/*therapy, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic/methods/trends, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods/trends, Risk Factors
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
29/11/2018 13:37
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:33
Données d'usage