Relationship between Peer Review and Bibliometrics

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_0C0425E2E762
Type
Partie de livre
Sous-type
Chapitre: chapitre ou section
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Relationship between Peer Review and Bibliometrics
Titre du livre
Handbook Bibliometrics
Auteur(s)
Ochsner Michael
Editeur
De Gruyter Saur
Lieu d'édition
Berlin/Munich/Boston
ISBN
9783110646610
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
18/01/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Editeur scientifique
Ball Rafael
Numéro de chapitre
2.6
Pages
125-132
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Peer review as the cornerstone of academic quality control has been accused of several biases. As a less subjective and biased alternative, bibliometric methods have been developed and implemented in evaluation procedures. This chapter discusses the relationship between peer review and bibliometrics, showing that bibliometrics is dependent on peer review and not free of its biases. Using three examples of interrelating peer review and bibliometrics, it concludes that rather than playing the two methods of evaluation off against each other, efforts should focus on the interplay and combination of the two.
Création de la notice
16/12/2020 16:48
Dernière modification de la notice
17/12/2020 6:24
Données d'usage