An implantable drug delivery system (IDDS) for refractory cancer pain provides sustained pain control, less drug-related toxicity, and possibly better survival compared with comprehensive medical management (CMM)

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_0C0350F0B872
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
An implantable drug delivery system (IDDS) for refractory cancer pain provides sustained pain control, less drug-related toxicity, and possibly better survival compared with comprehensive medical management (CMM)
Périodique
Annals of Oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Smith  T. J., Coyne  P. J., Staats  P. S., Deer  T., Stearns  L. J., Rauck  R. L., Boortz-Marx  R. L., Buchser  E., Catala  E., Bryce  D. A., Cousins  M., Pool  G. E.
ISSN
0923-7534 (Print)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2005
Volume
16
Numéro
5
Pages
825-33
Notes
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't --- Old month value: May
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The randomized clinical trial of implantable drug delivery systems (IDDS) plus comprehensive medical management (CMM) versus CMM alone showed better clinical success at 4 weeks for IDDS patients. This 'as treated' analysis assessed if improvements in pain control, drug toxicity and survival were maintained over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared those who received IDDS with those who did not receive IDDS (non-IDDS). All patients had Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) for pain > or =5/10 on at least 200 mg morphine or equivalent daily. RESULTS: At 4 weeks, 46 of 52 (88.5%) IDDS patients achieved clinical success compared with 65 of 91 (71.4%; P=0.02) non-IDDS patients, and more often achieved > or =20% reduction in both pain VAS and toxicity [35 of 52 (67.3%) versus 33 of 91 patients (36.3%); P=0.0003]. By 12 weeks, 47 of 57 (82.5%) IDDS patients had clinical success compared with 35 of 45 (77.8%; P=0.55) non-IDDS patients, and more often had a > or =20% reduction in both pain VAS and toxicity [33 of 57 (57.9%) versus 15 of 45 patients (33.3%); P=0.01]. At 12 weeks the IDDS VAS pain scores decreased from 7.81 to 3.89 (47% reduction) compared with 7.21 to 4.53 for non-IDDS patients (42% reduction; P=0.23). The 12 week drug toxicity scores for IDDS patients decreased from 6.68 to 2.30 (66% reduction), and for non-IDDS patients from 6.73 to 4.13 (37% reduction; P=0.01). All individual drug toxicities improved with IDDS at both 4 and 12 weeks. At 6 months, only 32% of the group randomized to CMM and who did not cross over to IDDS were alive, compared with 52%-59% for patients in those groups who received IDDS. CONCLUSIONS: IDDS improved clinical success, reduced pain scores, relieved most toxicity of pain control drugs, and was associated with increased survival for the duration of this 6 month trial.
Mots-clé
Adult Aged Analgesia/*methods Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage/adverse effects Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Female Follow-Up Studies Humans *Infusion Pumps, Implantable Male Middle Aged Neoplasms/*complications/diagnosis Pain Measurement Pain, Intractable/*drug therapy/etiology/*mortality Patient Satisfaction Probability Reference Values Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Survival Analysis Time Factors Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
28/01/2008 11:41
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:33
Données d'usage