Subjective visual echocardiographic estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction as an alternative to conventional echocardiographic methods: comparison with contrast angiography
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_09192820A886
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Subjective visual echocardiographic estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction as an alternative to conventional echocardiographic methods: comparison with contrast angiography
Périodique
Clinical Cardiology
ISSN
0160-9289 (Print)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/1991
Volume
14
Numéro
11
Pages
898-902
Notes
Clinical Trial
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article --- Old month value: Nov
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article --- Old month value: Nov
Résumé
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a measure of ventricular function with clinical and prognostic significance and can be reliably calculated with various M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic formulas in selected, good quality echocardiograms. Subjective visual echocardiographic estimate of LVEF is a potentially less time consuming and more widely applicable method. In order to test its reliability, we performed a prospective blind trial in 40 consecutive patients undergoing biplane contrast ventriculography (BCV), to compare the visual estimate of LVEF during a complete echocardiogram of three independent observers with (1) cubed M-mode formula, (2) Teichholz M-mode formula, (3) length-area method from the four-chamber view, and (4) Simpson's single plane formula. BCV was the reference method. The best correlation with BCV was obtained by visual estimate [r of the three observers, respectively = 0.75; 0.84; 0.81] and M-mode measurements [r (1) = 0.8; r (2) = 0.8], but the most sophisticated methods provided the poorest estimate [r (3) = 0.54; r (4) = 0.49]. All correlation coefficients improved when good studies, defined as a definition of the endocardial surface of more than 75%, were selected (n = 23), but the differences persisted. One observer systematically estimated higher values than the other two (Friedman's test, p less than 0.01) and this interobserver variability suggests that each echocardiographer should test himself against BCV in his lab in order to apply the visual estimate method reliably.
Mots-clé
Adult
Aged
Coronary Angiography/standards
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/standards
Echocardiography/*methods/standards
Evaluation Studies
Female
Heart Diseases/*diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
*Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Radionuclide Ventriculography/*standards
Reproducibility of Results
*Stroke Volume
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
28/01/2008 11:53
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 12:31