Optimal Timing of Invasive Coronary Angiography following NSTEMI.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 32206045_BIB_077F882FB39B.pdf (469.54 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_077F882FB39B
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Optimal Timing of Invasive Coronary Angiography following NSTEMI.
Périodique
Journal of interventional cardiology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Mahendiran T., Nanchen D., Meier D., Gencer B., Klingenberg R., Räber L., Carballo D., Matter C.M., Lüscher T.F., Windecker S., Mach F., Rodondi N., Muller O., Fournier S.
ISSN
1540-8183 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0896-4327
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
2020
Pages
8513257
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
To obtain a real-world perspective of the optimal timing of angiography performed within 24 hours of admission with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Current guidelines recommend angiography within 24 hours of hospitalisation with NSTEMI. The recent VERDICT trial found that angiography within 12 hours of admission with NSTEMI was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes among high-risk patients. We compared the outcomes of real-world NSTEMI patients undergoing angiography within 12 hours of admission with those of patients undergoing angiography 12 to 24 hours after admission.
NSTEMI patients without life-threatening features who received angiography within 24 hours of admission were obtained from the SPUM-ACS registry, a cohort of consecutive patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes to four university hospitals in Switzerland. Cox models assessed for an association between door-to-catheter time and one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke).
Of 2672 NSTEMI patients, 1832 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 1464 patients underwent angiography within 12 hours (12 h group) compared with 368 patients between 12 and 24 hours (12-24 h group). Multiple logistic regression identified out-of-hours admission as the only factor associated with delayed angiography. After 2 : 1 propensity score matching, 736 patients from the 12 h group and 368 patients from the 12-24 h group demonstrated no significant difference in rates of one-year MACE (7.7% vs. 7.3%, HR: 1.050, 95% CI 0.637-1.733, p=0.847). Stratification by GRACE score (>140 vs. ≤140) found no significant reduction in MACE among high-risk patients in the 12 h group (p=0.847). Stratification by GRACE score (>140 vs. ≤140) found no significant reduction in MACE among high-risk patients in the 12 h group (.
In an unselected real-world cohort of NSTEMI patients, angiography within 12 hours of admission was not associated with improved one-year cardiovascular outcomes when compared with angiography 12 and 24 hours after admission, even among high-risk patients.
Mots-clé
Aged, Cardiac Catheterization/methods, Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data, Coronary Angiography/methods, Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/complications, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Adjustment/methods, Switzerland/epidemiology, Time-to-Treatment/standards
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
01/04/2020 18:50
Dernière modification de la notice
24/11/2022 6:46
Données d'usage