A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 2 (Radiation Oncology).

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 31709186_BIB_051706248AB8.pdf (460.16 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_051706248AB8
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 2 (Radiation Oncology).
Périodique
Frontiers in oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Elicin O., Putora P.M., Siano M., Broglie M.A., Simon C., Zwahlen D., Huber G.F., Ballerini G., Beffa L., Giger R., Rothschild S., Negri S.V., Dulguerov P., Henke G.
ISSN
2234-943X (Print)
ISSN-L
2234-943X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
9
Pages
1126
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Background: The Head and Neck Cancer Working Group of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) has investigated the level of consensus (LOC) and discrepancy in everyday practice of diagnosis and treatment in head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: An online survey was iteratively generated with 10 Swiss university and teaching hospitals. LOC below 50% was defined as no agreement, while higher LOC were arbitrarily categorized as low (51-74%), moderate (75-84%), and high (≥85%). Results: Any LOC was achieved in 62% of topics (n = 60). High, moderate, and low LOC were found in 18, 20, and 23%, respectively. Regarding Head and Neck Surgery, Radiation Oncology, Medical Oncology, and biomarkers, LOC was achieved in 50, 57, 83, and 43%, respectively. Conclusions: Consensus on clinical topics is rather low for surgeons and radiation oncologists. The questions discussed might highlight discrepancies, stimulate standardization of practice, and prioritize topics for future clinical research.
Mots-clé
consensus, head and neck cancer, patterns of care, practice patterns, survey
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
14/11/2019 11:46
Dernière modification de la notice
12/01/2022 8:08
Données d'usage