Irrigation of continent catheterizable ileal pouches: tap water can replace sterile solutions because it is safe, easy, and economical.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_0227A5B217E4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Irrigation of continent catheterizable ileal pouches: tap water can replace sterile solutions because it is safe, easy, and economical.
Périodique
European urology
ISSN
1873-7560 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0302-2838
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
04/2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
59
Numéro
4
Pages
518-523
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Continent catheterizable ileal pouches require regular irrigations to reduce the risk of bacteriuria and urinary tract infections (UTIs).
Our aim was to compare the UTI rate, patient friendliness, and costs of standard sterile irrigation versus irrigation with tap water.
Twenty-three patients participated in a prospective randomized two-arm crossover single-center trial. Aseptic intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) combined with sterile sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.9% irrigation was compared with clean ISC and irrigation with tap water (H(2)O) during two study periods of 90 d each.
Patients underwent daily pouch irrigations with NaCl 0.9% solution or tap water.
Urine nitrite dipstick tests were evaluated daily; urine culture (UC) and patient friendliness were evaluated monthly. Costs were documented.
A total of 3916 study days with nitrite testing and irrigation were analyzed, 1876 (48%) in the NaCl arm and 2040 (52%) in the H(2)O arm. In the NaCl arm, 418 study days (22%) with nitrite-positive dipsticks were recorded, 219 d (11%) in the H(2)O arm, significantly fewer (p=0.01). Of the 149 UCs, 96 (64%) were positive, 48 in each arm, revealing a total of 16 different germs. All patients preferred the H(2)O method. Monthly costs were up to 20 times lower in the H(2)O arm.
Pouch irrigation with sterile NaCl 0.9% solution and tap water had comparable rates of positive UC. Irrigation with tap water significantly lowered the incidence of nitrite-positive study days and was substantially less costly and more patient friendly than NaCl irrigation. We therefore recommend the use of tap water (or bottled water) instead of sterile NaCl 0.9% solution for daily irrigation of continent catheterizable ileal pouches.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000618055, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12610000618055.aspx.
Our aim was to compare the UTI rate, patient friendliness, and costs of standard sterile irrigation versus irrigation with tap water.
Twenty-three patients participated in a prospective randomized two-arm crossover single-center trial. Aseptic intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) combined with sterile sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.9% irrigation was compared with clean ISC and irrigation with tap water (H(2)O) during two study periods of 90 d each.
Patients underwent daily pouch irrigations with NaCl 0.9% solution or tap water.
Urine nitrite dipstick tests were evaluated daily; urine culture (UC) and patient friendliness were evaluated monthly. Costs were documented.
A total of 3916 study days with nitrite testing and irrigation were analyzed, 1876 (48%) in the NaCl arm and 2040 (52%) in the H(2)O arm. In the NaCl arm, 418 study days (22%) with nitrite-positive dipsticks were recorded, 219 d (11%) in the H(2)O arm, significantly fewer (p=0.01). Of the 149 UCs, 96 (64%) were positive, 48 in each arm, revealing a total of 16 different germs. All patients preferred the H(2)O method. Monthly costs were up to 20 times lower in the H(2)O arm.
Pouch irrigation with sterile NaCl 0.9% solution and tap water had comparable rates of positive UC. Irrigation with tap water significantly lowered the incidence of nitrite-positive study days and was substantially less costly and more patient friendly than NaCl irrigation. We therefore recommend the use of tap water (or bottled water) instead of sterile NaCl 0.9% solution for daily irrigation of continent catheterizable ileal pouches.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000618055, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12610000618055.aspx.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage, Colonic Pouches, Cost Savings, Cross-Over Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitrites/urine, Patient Satisfaction, Pyridines/administration & dosage, Risk Factors, Self Care/economics, Self Care/methods, Sodium Chloride, Therapeutic Irrigation/economics, Therapeutic Irrigation/methods, Urinary Catheterization/economics, Urinary Catheterization/methods, Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology, Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control, Urinary Tract Infections/urine, Water Supply
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
08/01/2021 15:26
Dernière modification de la notice
09/01/2021 6:26
Données d'usage
