Targeted therapy against multi-resistant bacteria in leukemic and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-4, 2011).

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_FA1EDD167A59
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Targeted therapy against multi-resistant bacteria in leukemic and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-4, 2011).
Journal
Haematologica
Author(s)
Averbuch D., Cordonnier C., Livermore D.M., Mikulska M., Orasch C., Viscoli C., Gyssens I.C., Kern W.V., Klyasova G., Marchetti O., Engelhard D., Akova M., ECIL4 a joint venture of EBMT EORTC ICHS ESGICH/ESCMID , ELN 
Contributor(s)
ECIL4 a joint venture of EBMT EORTC ICHS ESGICH/ESCMID , ELN 
ISSN
1592-8721 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0390-6078
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Volume
98
Number
12
Pages
1836-1847
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish. pdf type: guideline article
Abstract
The detection of multi-resistant bacterial pathogens, particularly those to carbapenemases, in leukemic and stem cell transplant patients forces the use of old or non-conventional agents as the only remaining treatment options. These include colistin/polymyxin B, tigecycline, fosfomycin and various anti-gram-positive agents. Data on the use of these agents in leukemic patients are scanty, with only linezolid subjected to formal trials. The Expert Group of the 4(th) European Conference on Infections in Leukemia has developed guidelines for their use in these patient populations. Targeted therapy should be based on (i) in vitro susceptibility data, (ii) knowledge of the best treatment option against the particular species or phenotype of bacteria, (iii) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data, and (iv) careful assessment of the risk-benefit balance. For infections due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria, these agents should be preferably used in combination with other agents that remain active in vitro, because of suboptimal efficacy (e.g., tigecycline) and the risk of emergent resistance (e.g., fosfomycin). The paucity of new antibacterial drugs in the near future should lead us to limit the use of these drugs to situations where no alternative exists.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
14/01/2014 17:22
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:25
Usage data