To compare three different methods for obtaining interventricular-(VV) interval optimization.
A total of 30 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were enrolled. All the patients underwent VV-interval optimization performed with three different echocardiographic methods at seven different settings: simultaneous right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular pacing, LV stimulation only, LV preexcitation (LV+20,+40,+60 ms, respectively), RV preexcitation (RV+20 and+40 ms, respectively). Optimal VV delay was selected by: (1) measuring the aortic velocity time integral (VTI method); (2) measuring the time to maximum delay between septal and lateral longitudinal motion in the four-chamber view (velocity method); and (3) measuring the segment with maximal temporal difference of peak circumferential strain in short-axis view at papillary muscles level, (strain method). Velocity and strain methods measurements were obtained relying on two-dimensional ultrasound border tracking algorithm thus providing angle-independent measurements.
Immediately after CRT, VTI, maximum peak circumferential strain delay and maximum septal-to-lateral delay were significantly improved (P < 0.001). Particularly, VV-interval optimization determined a further improvement of these indices as compared to the other VV settings (P < 0.001). Furthermore, a substantial concordance was found between the optimal VV interval obtained according to the VTI method and velocity method (k = 0.68), between the optimal VV interval obtained according to the VTI method and strain method (k = 0.63); and between the optimal VV interval obtained according to the velocity method and strain method (k = 0.71).
VV-interval optimization was shown to determine a further benefit beyond CRT. A significant concordance was present between VV programming based on different echocardiographic methods.