Selective rather than universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus?

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_F75DB7123D4E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Selective rather than universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus?
Journal
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
Author(s)
Miailhe G., Kayem G., Girard G., Legardeur H., Mandelbrot L.
ISSN
1872-7654 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0301-2115
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
191
Pages
95-100
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Observational Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To estimate the proportion of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who would be missed by selective versus universal screening and to describe their pregnancy outcomes.
An observational cohort study in a single center performing universal screening for GDM with a 75 g oral glucose challenge test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks gestation. We excluded women with pregestational or first trimester diabetes, those not screened and deliveries <34 weeks. Risk factors were age ≥ 35 years, BMI ≥ 25, family history of diabetes, GDM in a previous pregnancy or macrosomia in a previous pregnancy. Main outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA>90th centile for gestational age, adjusted for gender) and small for gestational age<10th centile.
Among 2187 women screened, 309 (14%) had GDM, of whom 256 (83%) had one or more risk factors. The proportion of women who had GDM despite the absence of any risk factor was 2.4%. In multivariate analysis, LGA was significantly associated with GDM only in case of risk factors. Mean fasting blood glucose was lower in GDM without risk factors than in GDM with risk factors (87 ± 1 mg/dl versus 94 ± 14, p<0.001) and fewer required insulin (6% versus 26%, respectively, p<0.001).
Selective screening would have missed one-sixth of GDM cases, but these cases seemed milder, with normal fasting blood glucose, and thus less likely to lead to perinatal complications. Whereas an opt-in approach relies heavily on accurate patient screening, we suggest that screening tests could be avoided in low-risk women by an opt-out approach.
Keywords
Adult, Cohort Studies, Delayed Diagnosis/prevention & control, Diabetes, Gestational/blood, Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis, Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology, Electronic Health Records, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Hospitals, Urban, Humans, Incidence, Mass Screening, Paris/epidemiology, Precision Medicine, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prenatal Diagnosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Tertiary Care Centers, Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), Large for gestational age (LGA), Macrosomia, Screening, Selective, Universal
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
13/12/2021 14:21
Last modification date
14/12/2021 7:33
Usage data