Accuracy of heparin-induced platelet aggregation test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_EF8DACCBB75E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Accuracy of heparin-induced platelet aggregation test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Journal
Thrombosis research
ISSN
1879-2472 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0049-3848
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
185
Pages
27-30
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Whereas the utility of washed platelet assays such as the heparin-induced platelet activation test (HIPA) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is regarded as high, the performance of simpler assays such as the heparin-induced platelet aggregation test (PAT) is still elusive. Using well-characterized samples of a large cohort study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PAT for the diagnosis of HIT.
One-hundred twenty-two immunoassay-positive serum samples of a previous, prospective single-center cohort study including consecutive patients with suspected HIT (n = 1291) were used. HIPA was determined as reference gold standard; samples were previously analyzed using PAT as well as polyspecific platelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 4Ts score was calculated using the patient documentation. Diagnosis of HIT was defined as a positive HIPA, which is a positive reaction in 2 out of 4 donor platelets within 30 min.
HIT was diagnosed in 39 out of 122 patients corresponding to a prevalence of 32%. Median optical density (ELISA) was 2.8 (inter-quartile range 2.3, 3.0) in patients with HIT and 0.7 (0.5, 1.3) in patients without HIT. PAT was positive in 27 out of 39 HIT patients and it was negative in 83 out of 83 HIT-negative patients. Thus, the sensitivity of PAT for the diagnosis of HIT was 69% (95% confidence interval 52%, 83%) and the specificity 100% (96%, 100%).
Our results demonstrate that PAT is a valuable test to confirm HIT but cannot be applied to rule-out HIT in clinical practice.
One-hundred twenty-two immunoassay-positive serum samples of a previous, prospective single-center cohort study including consecutive patients with suspected HIT (n = 1291) were used. HIPA was determined as reference gold standard; samples were previously analyzed using PAT as well as polyspecific platelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 4Ts score was calculated using the patient documentation. Diagnosis of HIT was defined as a positive HIPA, which is a positive reaction in 2 out of 4 donor platelets within 30 min.
HIT was diagnosed in 39 out of 122 patients corresponding to a prevalence of 32%. Median optical density (ELISA) was 2.8 (inter-quartile range 2.3, 3.0) in patients with HIT and 0.7 (0.5, 1.3) in patients without HIT. PAT was positive in 27 out of 39 HIT patients and it was negative in 83 out of 83 HIT-negative patients. Thus, the sensitivity of PAT for the diagnosis of HIT was 69% (95% confidence interval 52%, 83%) and the specificity 100% (96%, 100%).
Our results demonstrate that PAT is a valuable test to confirm HIT but cannot be applied to rule-out HIT in clinical practice.
Keywords
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, Heparin/adverse effects, Immunoassay/methods, Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced, Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/11/2019 23:03
Last modification date
19/11/2020 6:26