Parenteral nutrition in the hospital setting/short-term parenteral nutrition.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_ED0BE7BE5753
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Parenteral nutrition in the hospital setting/short-term parenteral nutrition.
Journal
American journal of health-system pharmacy
ISSN
1535-2900 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1079-2082
Publication state
Published
Issued date
13/06/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
81
Number
Supplement_3
Pages
S102-S111
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit concerning the acute care setting. Some European practices presented in this article do not conform with USP general chapter <797> requirements. Nevertheless, the purpose is to cover the challenges experienced in delivering high-quality PN within hospitals in the United States and Europe, in order to share best practices and experiences more widely.
Core issues regarding the PN process within an acute care setting are largely the same everywhere: There are ongoing pressures for greater efficiency, optimization, and also concurrent commitments to make PN safer for patients. Within Europe, in recent years, the use of market-authorized multi-chamber bags (MCBs) has increased greatly, mainly for safety, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency purposes. However, in the US, hospitals with low PN volumes may face particular challenges, as automated compounding equipment is often unaffordable in this setting and the variety of available MCBs is limited. This can result in the need to operate several PN systems in parallel, adding to the complexity of the PN use process. Ongoing PN quality and safety initiatives from US institutions with various PN volumes are presented. In the future, the availability of a greater selection of MCBs in the US may increase, leading to a reduction in dependence on compounded PN, as has been seen in many European countries.
The examples presented may encourage improvements in the safety and quality of PN within the acute care setting worldwide.
Core issues regarding the PN process within an acute care setting are largely the same everywhere: There are ongoing pressures for greater efficiency, optimization, and also concurrent commitments to make PN safer for patients. Within Europe, in recent years, the use of market-authorized multi-chamber bags (MCBs) has increased greatly, mainly for safety, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency purposes. However, in the US, hospitals with low PN volumes may face particular challenges, as automated compounding equipment is often unaffordable in this setting and the variety of available MCBs is limited. This can result in the need to operate several PN systems in parallel, adding to the complexity of the PN use process. Ongoing PN quality and safety initiatives from US institutions with various PN volumes are presented. In the future, the availability of a greater selection of MCBs in the US may increase, leading to a reduction in dependence on compounded PN, as has been seen in many European countries.
The examples presented may encourage improvements in the safety and quality of PN within the acute care setting worldwide.
Keywords
Humans, Europe, Hospitals, Parenteral Nutrition/methods, Parenteral Nutrition/standards, Parenteral Nutrition Solutions, Patient Safety, Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration, United States, Congresses as Topic, acute care setting, compounding, cost-effectiveness, multichamber bags, parenteral nutrition, safety
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/06/2024 13:28
Last modification date
26/07/2024 6:01