Clinical recommendations of cardiac magnetic resonance, Part II: inflammatory and congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies and cardiac tumors: a position paper of the working group 'Applicazioni della Risonanza Magnetica' of the Italian Society of Cardiology.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_E74929743EAD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Clinical recommendations of cardiac magnetic resonance, Part II: inflammatory and congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies and cardiac tumors: a position paper of the working group 'Applicazioni della Risonanza Magnetica' of the Italian Society of Cardiology.
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular medicine
Author(s)
Pontone G., Di Bella G., Silvia C., Maestrini V., Festa P., Ait-Ali L., Masci P.G., Monti L., di Giovine G., De Lazzari M., Cipriani A., Guaricci A.I., Dellegrottaglie S., Pepe A., Marra M.P., Aquaro G.D.
ISSN
1558-2035 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1558-2027
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Number
4
Pages
209-222
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The current document was developed by the working group on the 'application of cardiac magnetic resonance' of the Italian Society of Cardiology to provide a perspective on the current state of technical advances and clinical cardiac magnetic resonance applications and to inform cardiologists how to implement their clinical and diagnostic pathway with the introduction of this technique in the clinical practice. Appropriateness criteria were defined using a score system: score 1-3 = inappropriate (test is not generally acceptable and is not a reasonable approach for the indication), score 4-6 = uncertain (test may be generally acceptable and may be a reasonable approach for the indication but more research and/or patient information is needed to classify the indication definitively) and score 7-9 = appropriate (test is generally acceptable and is a reasonable approach for the indication).

Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
24/01/2017 19:24
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:10
Usage data