Chirurgie de réduction de volume pulmonaire pour emphysème: approche uni- ou bilatérale [Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema: a unilateral or bilateral approach?].
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_E69A72C86C38
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Chirurgie de réduction de volume pulmonaire pour emphysème: approche uni- ou bilatérale [Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema: a unilateral or bilateral approach?].
Journal
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires
ISSN
0761-8425 (Print)
ISSN-L
0761-8425
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2004
Volume
21
Number
3 Pt 1
Pages
567-571
Language
french
Notes
Publication types: English Abstract ; Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Lung Volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a recognized therapeutic option for patients presenting with severe and disabling pulmonary emphysema. Case selection is based upon clinical, morphological and functional criteria.
STATE OF THE ART: LVRS has shown promising results, with improvements in exercise capacity, pulmonary function and quality of life, in selected patients with severe and disabling emphysema. A variety of surgical techniques have been described. The procedure may be unilateral or bilateral, through a sternotomy or by a video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) technique. The controversial aspects of the surgical technique will be analysed and discussed in the following review.
PERSPECTIVES: A bilateral approach clearly offers a better functional improvement when compared to a unilateral procedure, however, the postoperative functional decline appears greater and more rapid after a bilateral procedure. A unilateral approach, with often less postoperative morbidity, allows the option to perform a future contra-lateral procedure in the event of further clinical or functional deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases LVRS is an effective treatment for severe pulmonary emphysema. Different surgical techniques have been described. Nowadays VATS is considered to be the technique of choice, with the option to carry out a future unilateral or bilateral procedure.
STATE OF THE ART: LVRS has shown promising results, with improvements in exercise capacity, pulmonary function and quality of life, in selected patients with severe and disabling emphysema. A variety of surgical techniques have been described. The procedure may be unilateral or bilateral, through a sternotomy or by a video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) technique. The controversial aspects of the surgical technique will be analysed and discussed in the following review.
PERSPECTIVES: A bilateral approach clearly offers a better functional improvement when compared to a unilateral procedure, however, the postoperative functional decline appears greater and more rapid after a bilateral procedure. A unilateral approach, with often less postoperative morbidity, allows the option to perform a future contra-lateral procedure in the event of further clinical or functional deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases LVRS is an effective treatment for severe pulmonary emphysema. Different surgical techniques have been described. Nowadays VATS is considered to be the technique of choice, with the option to carry out a future unilateral or bilateral procedure.
Keywords
Humans, Pneumonectomy/methods, Pulmonary Emphysema/surgery
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/01/2008 13:00
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:09