Psychometric validity of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure and the Burnout Assessment Tool: a systematic review.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_E648ECA6DB3C
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Psychometric validity of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure and the Burnout Assessment Tool: a systematic review.
Journal
Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju
Author(s)
Shoman Y., Hostettler R., Canu I.G.
ISSN
1848-6312 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0004-1254
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/12/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
74
Number
4
Pages
238-245
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Systematic Review ; Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
In the absence of internationally recognised standardised criteria, several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to measure occupational burnout. The aim of this study was to extend our 2021 review of the psychometric validity of five PROMs to the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) and the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). To do that we ran a systematic literature search in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase databases following our previous methodological framework and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). We assessed the level of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline. We identified 694 publications on SMBM and 421 on BAT, but the final review includes eight papers on SMBM and three on BAT. Of the seven psychometric properties assessed for SMBM, content, structural, and criterion validity were rated as insufficient, whereas the quality of evidence for construct and internal consistency was high and moderate, respectively. Of the nine psychometric properties assessed for BAT, content, structural, criterion, and construct validity was moderate and internal consistency was high. One limitation of this study is that we did not assess cross-cultural validity, because the number of studies reviewed is too small and content validity can only be assessed based on the original PROM version rather than translation. To conclude, BAT is superior to SMBM in terms of psychometric validity, but the quality of evidence for some properties is low or very low, suggesting a need for additional validation studies.
Keywords
Humans, Burnout, Professional, Psychometrics, Burnout, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, BAT, SMBM, mjere ishoda koje opisuje pacijent, occupational burnout, patient-reported outcome measures, profesionalno izgaranje, psihometrijska svojstva, psychometric properties
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
04/01/2024 10:52
Last modification date
03/02/2024 7:13
Usage data