Sulfur isotope analyses using 3× elemental analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry: Saving helium and energy while reducing analytical time and costs

Details

Ressource 1Download: Spangenberg and Bosco-Santos_2024_3-EA-IRMS sulfur isotope analysis.pdf (2292.49 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_E5B86959B50B
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Sulfur isotope analyses using 3× elemental analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry: Saving helium and energy while reducing analytical time and costs
Journal
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Author(s)
Spangenberg J. E., Bosco-Santos A.
ISSN
0951-4198
1097-0231
ISSN-L
0951-4198
Publication state
Published
Issued date
15/10/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Number
19
Pages
e9866
Language
english
Abstract
Helium (He) and energy shortages have caused price increases and reduced their availability. Using three combustion reactions per acquisition of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios saves 50% He and energy during the elemental analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA/IRMS). This approach needs to be tested for sulfur isotope (δ <sup>34</sup> S) analyses.
A new method to measure δ <sup>34</sup> S in three sequential combustion reactions within one EA/IRMS acquisition was developed. The same material or blank samples could be used in the three reactions. After SO <sub>2</sub> was used, a N <sub>2</sub> purging method was employed to prolong the lifetime of the valves in the EA/IRMS interface. The 3×EA/IRMS was applied to measure δ <sup>34</sup> S in precious samples, such as Ag <sub>2</sub> S from acid-volatile and chromium-reducible sulfur extracted with a multiple-port setup.
The 3×EA/IRMS-δ <sup>34</sup> S method was validated with replicate analyses of international reference materials and laboratory standards with a wide range of mineralogical compositions and δ <sup>34</sup> S values. The method provided a strategic advantage for the δ <sup>34</sup> S measurements of small precious samples (measured between blanks). The accuracy and precision of the 3×EA/IRMS values effectively matched those obtained using conventional EA/IRMS, with good agreement between the mean ± SD values and the recommended values with their uncertainties.
Compared with the conventional EA/IRMS, the proposed method provides accurate and precise δ <sup>34</sup> S measurements of the sulfate and sulfide samples while saving approximately 50% of He, energy, SO <sub>2</sub> reference gas, O <sub>2</sub> , analysis time, and cost. Notably, 3×EA/IRMS can provide up to three δ <sup>34</sup> S values unaffected by memory effects.
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Funding(s)
University of Lausanne
Swiss National Science Foundation
Create date
29/07/2024 14:34
Last modification date
21/08/2024 7:23
Usage data