Percutaneous and surgical radiofrequency ablation of liver malignancies: a single institutional experience.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_DCB9600099B4
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Percutaneous and surgical radiofrequency ablation of liver malignancies: a single institutional experience.
Journal
Acta Gastro-enterologica Belgica
ISSN
1784-3227 (Print)
ISSN-L
1784-3227
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2007
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
70
Number
2
Pages
188-194
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: the purpose of this study was to report a single academic institution's experience with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver malignancies
METHODS: Sixty-five patients underwent RFA technique through a percutaneous (Group I: 33 patients) or a surgical approach (Group II: 32 patients). The two groups were different according to type of disease selection (more hepatocellular carcinoma in Group I and liver metastases in Group II) and tumour features (smaller size but greater number of lesions in Group II). In Group II, RFA was associated to liver resection in 23 patients (72%).
RESULTS: The 2-month postoperative mortality and complication rates were low in both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was longer in Group II. During a median follow-up of 24 months in Group I and 21 months in Group II, the local "in-situ" recurrence rate was 41.4% and 9.1%, respectively. For RFA-treated tumours < 30 mm in size, the local "in-situ" recurrence rate was 40.5% in Group I and 0% in Group II. Multivariate statistical analysis demonstrated that larger tumour and a percutaneous approach for RFA were independent predictive factors of local "in-situ" liver tumour recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: RFA appears to be a safe technique for treating liver malignancies by both approaches. Tumour size and type of RFA approach are predictive factors of in-situ liver tumour recurrence.
METHODS: Sixty-five patients underwent RFA technique through a percutaneous (Group I: 33 patients) or a surgical approach (Group II: 32 patients). The two groups were different according to type of disease selection (more hepatocellular carcinoma in Group I and liver metastases in Group II) and tumour features (smaller size but greater number of lesions in Group II). In Group II, RFA was associated to liver resection in 23 patients (72%).
RESULTS: The 2-month postoperative mortality and complication rates were low in both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was longer in Group II. During a median follow-up of 24 months in Group I and 21 months in Group II, the local "in-situ" recurrence rate was 41.4% and 9.1%, respectively. For RFA-treated tumours < 30 mm in size, the local "in-situ" recurrence rate was 40.5% in Group I and 0% in Group II. Multivariate statistical analysis demonstrated that larger tumour and a percutaneous approach for RFA were independent predictive factors of local "in-situ" liver tumour recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: RFA appears to be a safe technique for treating liver malignancies by both approaches. Tumour size and type of RFA approach are predictive factors of in-situ liver tumour recurrence.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Belgium/epidemiology, Catheter Ablation/methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Liver Neoplasms/mortality, Liver Neoplasms/pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology, Neoplasm Staging, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
20/10/2016 16:09
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:01