How much does the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score have to improve to indicate that patients with chronic low back pain feel better or well?
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_CE0D9C88405E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
How much does the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score have to improve to indicate that patients with chronic low back pain feel better or well?
Journal
European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
Working group(s)
Section Rachis de la Société Française de Rhumatologie
ISSN
1432-0932 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0940-6719
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
25
Number
1
Pages
304-309
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) assesses the impact of low back pain (LBP) on four components (0-100) of daily life. We estimated the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) values of DPQ in LBP patients.
METHODS: 142 patients with LBP lasting for at least 4 weeks completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 6 months later. Questions for MCII addressed patient-reported response to treatment at 6 months on a five-point Likert scale, while a yes/no question concerning satisfaction with present state was used to determine PASS. MCII was computed as the difference in mean DPQ scores between patients reporting treatment as effective vs. patients reporting treatment as not effective, and PASS was computed as the third quartile of the DPQ score among patients who reported being satisfied with their present state.
RESULTS: MCII values were 22, 23, 2 and 10 for daily activities, work and leisure, social interest, and anxiety/depression, respectively. PASS values were 29, 23, 20 and 21 for the four components, respectively. The PASS total score threshold of 24 correctly classified 84.1 % of the patients who reported being unsatisfied with their present state, and 74.7 % of patients reported being satisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: These values give information of paramount importance for clinicians in interpreting change in DPQ values over time. Authors should be encouraged to report the percentage of patients who reach MCII and PASS values in randomized clinical trials and cohort studies to help clinicians to interpret clinical results.
METHODS: 142 patients with LBP lasting for at least 4 weeks completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 6 months later. Questions for MCII addressed patient-reported response to treatment at 6 months on a five-point Likert scale, while a yes/no question concerning satisfaction with present state was used to determine PASS. MCII was computed as the difference in mean DPQ scores between patients reporting treatment as effective vs. patients reporting treatment as not effective, and PASS was computed as the third quartile of the DPQ score among patients who reported being satisfied with their present state.
RESULTS: MCII values were 22, 23, 2 and 10 for daily activities, work and leisure, social interest, and anxiety/depression, respectively. PASS values were 29, 23, 20 and 21 for the four components, respectively. The PASS total score threshold of 24 correctly classified 84.1 % of the patients who reported being unsatisfied with their present state, and 74.7 % of patients reported being satisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: These values give information of paramount importance for clinicians in interpreting change in DPQ values over time. Authors should be encouraged to report the percentage of patients who reach MCII and PASS values in randomized clinical trials and cohort studies to help clinicians to interpret clinical results.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Chronic Pain/diagnosis, Chronic Pain/therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Low Back Pain/diagnosis, Low Back Pain/therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement/methods, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
23/09/2016 19:56
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:48