Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis.
Details
Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_CBCDD574A18F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis.
Journal
Surgery today
ISSN
1436-2813 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0941-1291
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
52
Number
2
Pages
171-181
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Although esophagectomy remains the preferred treatment for esophageal cancer, it is still associated with a number of complications, including post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to summarize the reported incidence of VTE after esophagectomy, its risk factors, and prevention strategies.
We conducted a systematic search of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria and were selected in the present review. Overall, we identified 9768 patients who underwent esophagectomy, with a post-operative VTE rate of 4% (440 patients). The reported risk factors for VTE included advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV, a history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, and the implementation of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy. Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome was also associated with VTE. No universally applied prevention strategies for VTE after esophagectomy were identified in the literature.
Despite advances in perioperative care, VTE after esophagectomy still represents a source of morbidity for about 4% of patients. Low molecular weight heparin is suggested as the routine standard prophylactic regimen after esophageal cancer surgery.
We conducted a systematic search of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria and were selected in the present review. Overall, we identified 9768 patients who underwent esophagectomy, with a post-operative VTE rate of 4% (440 patients). The reported risk factors for VTE included advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV, a history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, and the implementation of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy. Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome was also associated with VTE. No universally applied prevention strategies for VTE after esophagectomy were identified in the literature.
Despite advances in perioperative care, VTE after esophagectomy still represents a source of morbidity for about 4% of patients. Low molecular weight heparin is suggested as the routine standard prophylactic regimen after esophageal cancer surgery.
Keywords
Aged, Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery, Esophagectomy/adverse effects, Female, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Postoperative Complications/prevention & control, Risk Factors, Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology, Venous Thromboembolism/etiology, Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control, Deep vein thrombosis, Esophageal cancer, Postoperative complication, Pulmonary embolism, Risk factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
27/03/2021 16:03
Last modification date
15/06/2023 5:56