HDR brachytherapy boost and external radiotherapy for unfavorable prostate cancer patients

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_C67F0EB63D94
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Publication sub-type
Poster: Summary – with images – on one page of the results of a researche project. The summaries of the poster must be entered in "Abstract" and not "Poster".
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
HDR brachytherapy boost and external radiotherapy for unfavorable prostate cancer patients
Title of the conference
WCB 2013, World Congress of Brachytherapy
Author(s)
Monteiro Grillo I., Pina F., Mendoça V., Amado A., Melich-Cerveira J., Marcelino G., Marques-Vidal P.
Address
Barcelona, Spain, May 10-12, 2012
ISBN
0167-8140
ISSN-L
0167-8140
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2012
Volume
103
Series
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Pages
S88-S89
Language
english
Abstract
Purpose/Objective: To evaluate the outcome of prostate cancer
patients treated with a combination of HDR Brachytherapy boost
(HDR-BT) and 3D conformal external pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) in a
dose escalation study.
Materials and Methods: 162 patients were followed between
November 2004 and December 2010 . Two different dose escalation
groups were done: group 1 (n= 92), 1 fraction HDR boost (9-10 Gy )
followed by EBRT (60 Gy in 6 weeks) - BED: 203-216 Gy and group 2
(n=70): 2 fraction HDR boost (18-19 Gy), 6 hours interval between
fractions, followed by EBRT (46 Gy in 4.5 weeks) - BED: 233.3 -247 Gy;
116 pts (71.6%) received concomitant androgen deprivation. Patients
were classified according to the MSKCC criteria into high (N=137) and
intermediate (N=25) risk. Phoenix biochemical failure definition was
used. Toxicity was scored by Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria
(RTOG)
Results: The mean follow-up was 41 (range 7-84) months. The 7- years
cancer-specific and overall survival was 100% an 92%, respectively.
The 7 years actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% and 100% for
group 1 and 2, respectively. One patient from group 1 and two
patients from group 2 never reached a low nadir. Two patients
developed distant metastases 12 and 16 months after the treatment.
In a multivariate Cox-regression analysis neither treatment nor risk
group (intermediate vs. high risk) were associated with increased risk
for biochemical failure. The RTOG grade 3 genitourinary early toxicity
was 1.0% and 8.5% while gastrointestinal/genitourinary late toxicity
was 7.6% and 1.4% for group 1 and 2, respectively
Conclusions: HDR BT boost followed by EBRT appears to be a safe,
feasible and effective treatment for patients with unfavorable
localized prostate cancer. This study shows a beneficial effect on
biochemical control in group 2 pts, however without statistical
significance. Higher radiation doses (BED 233.3-247 Gy) do not seem
to carry extra toxicity.
Create date
12/03/2013 17:31
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:41
Usage data