Comparison of MR flow quantification in peripheral and main pulmonary arteries in patients after right ventricular outflow tract surgery: A retrospective study.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_C667ABC53198
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparison of MR flow quantification in peripheral and main pulmonary arteries in patients after right ventricular outflow tract surgery: A retrospective study.
Journal
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Author(s)
Rutz T., Meierhofer C., Naumann S., Martinoff S., Ewert P., Stern H.C., Fratz S.
ISSN
1522-2586 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1053-1807
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
46
Number
6
Pages
1839-1845
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To compare the quantification of pulmonary stroke volume (SV) by phase contrast magnetic resonance (PC-MR) in the main pulmonary artery (MPA) to the sum of SVs in both peripheral pulmonary arteries (PPA) in different right ventricular (RV) outflow pathologies.
Pulmonary SV was determined by PC-MR in the MPA and the PPA in healthy individuals (H, n = 54), patients after correction for tetralogy of Fallot with significant pulmonary regurgitation and without pulmonary or RV outflow tract stenosis (PR, n = 50), and in patients with RV outflow tract or pulmonary valve stenosis (PS, n = 50). Resulting SVs were compared to aortic SV in the ascending aorta.
Mean age was similar between the groups: H 28 ± 17 vs. PR 24 ± 11 vs. PS 22 ± 10 years. Bland-Altman analyses revealed in all groups a relatively small systemic (bias) but large random error (limits of agreement) for pulmonary SV determined in the MPA as compared to summed SVs in the PPA. The largest limits of agreement were present in PS patients: H: MPA 3.9% (-11, + 19) vs. PPA 0.4% (-15, + 15); PR: MPA 5.2% (-25, + 36) vs. PPA 0.6% (-24, + 26); PS: MPA 5% (-36; + 46), PPA -0.03% (-34, + 35).
The accuracy of PC-MR in the MPA is reasonable; however, a large random error (precision) is observed that is most pronounced in PS patients. This potential error should be taken into consideration when interpreting MPA flow measurements.
3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1839-1845.
Keywords
Adult, Female, Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging, Heart Ventricles/physiopathology, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Male, Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging, Postoperative Complications/physiopathology, Pulmonary Artery/diagnostic imaging, Pulmonary Artery/physiopathology, Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging, Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology, Pulmonary Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging, Pulmonary Valve Stenosis/physiopathology, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Stroke Volume/physiology, Tetralogy of Fallot/surgery, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnostic imaging, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/physiopathology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/surgery, Young Adult, accuracy, cardiac magnetic resonance, congenital heart disease, phase-velocity magnetic resonance, precision, pulmonary artery
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
07/08/2017 11:43
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:41
Usage data