Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Native Valve Endocarditis: Systematic Review and Bivariate Meta-Analysis.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_BC3B9C2D5E75
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Native Valve Endocarditis: Systematic Review and Bivariate Meta-Analysis.
Journal
Diagnostics
ISSN
2075-4418 (Print)
ISSN-L
2075-4418
Publication state
Published
Issued date
25/09/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
10
Number
10
Pages
754
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Infectious endocarditis is a life-threatening disease, requiring prompt and accurate diagnosis. The aim of this article is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to estimate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT) for the diagnosis of native valve endocarditis (NVE).
Selected articles evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected NVE, resulting from a comprehensive literature search through the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases until April 2020, were included for the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Seven studies (351 episodes of suspected NVE) were included. <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT yielded a pooled sensitivity of 36.3% and a pooled specificity of 99.1% for the diagnosis of NVE. The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 8.3, 0.6, and 15.3, respectively. The sensitivity increased using contemporary PET/CT device with state-of-the-art patient preparation as well as innovative image acquisitions or adding the results of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT in a multimodality strategy.
In our systematic review and meta-analysis, <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT yielded a poor pooled sensitivity with an otherwise excellent pooled specificity for the diagnosis of NVE; however, several factors may increase the sensitivity without affecting the specificity and these factors should be better evaluated in future studies.
Selected articles evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected NVE, resulting from a comprehensive literature search through the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases until April 2020, were included for the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Seven studies (351 episodes of suspected NVE) were included. <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT yielded a pooled sensitivity of 36.3% and a pooled specificity of 99.1% for the diagnosis of NVE. The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 8.3, 0.6, and 15.3, respectively. The sensitivity increased using contemporary PET/CT device with state-of-the-art patient preparation as well as innovative image acquisitions or adding the results of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT in a multimodality strategy.
In our systematic review and meta-analysis, <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET/CT yielded a poor pooled sensitivity with an otherwise excellent pooled specificity for the diagnosis of NVE; however, several factors may increase the sensitivity without affecting the specificity and these factors should be better evaluated in future studies.
Keywords
18F-FDG, PET/CT, diagnostic performance, infectious diseases, infectious endocarditis, meta-analysis, native valve endocarditis, positron emission tomography, systematic review.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
02/10/2020 11:54
Last modification date
07/03/2024 7:13