Single-incision vs. conventional laparoscopic appendectomy : a case-match study
Details
Download: BIB_B877F6010424.P001.pdf (408.88 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_B877F6010424
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Single-incision vs. conventional laparoscopic appendectomy : a case-match study
Journal
SAGE Open Medicine
ISSN
2050-3121
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
2
Pages
10.1177
Language
english
Abstract
Background: Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy is considered standard in many countries for the surgical treatment
of acute appendicitis. Single-incision laparoscopic technique has been recently introduced and is supposed to minimize the
aggression induced by surgery. Regarding appendectomy, comparison with standard laparoscopy, benefits and drawbacks of
this novel technique remain to be evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy
compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate,
and postoperative antibiotherapy rate.
Methods: From February 2011 to December 2011, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was proposed to patients
admitted to the emergency room of the University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland), diagnosed
with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Preoperative patients' information, technical difficulties during the operation, and
postoperative follow-ups were recorded. Every patient who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 20)
was matched 1:3 conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 60), controlling for age, gender, body mass index, American
Society of Anesthesiologists score, and histopathological findings.
Results: No statistically significant differences for median operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and
need for postoperative antibiotherapy were found. In 5 out of 20 single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy patients the
Endoloop® Ligature was judged difficult to put in place.
Conclusion: This study suggests that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and effective operative technique
for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
of acute appendicitis. Single-incision laparoscopic technique has been recently introduced and is supposed to minimize the
aggression induced by surgery. Regarding appendectomy, comparison with standard laparoscopy, benefits and drawbacks of
this novel technique remain to be evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy
compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate,
and postoperative antibiotherapy rate.
Methods: From February 2011 to December 2011, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was proposed to patients
admitted to the emergency room of the University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland), diagnosed
with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Preoperative patients' information, technical difficulties during the operation, and
postoperative follow-ups were recorded. Every patient who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 20)
was matched 1:3 conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 60), controlling for age, gender, body mass index, American
Society of Anesthesiologists score, and histopathological findings.
Results: No statistically significant differences for median operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and
need for postoperative antibiotherapy were found. In 5 out of 20 single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy patients the
Endoloop® Ligature was judged difficult to put in place.
Conclusion: This study suggests that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and effective operative technique
for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
12/02/2015 11:55
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:26