Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of non-reconstructable stable critical leg ischaemia: results of the European Peripheral Vascular Disease Outcome Study (SCS-EPOS)

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_B2C67A424D10
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of non-reconstructable stable critical leg ischaemia: results of the European Peripheral Vascular Disease Outcome Study (SCS-EPOS)
Journal
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Author(s)
Amann  W., Berg  P., Gersbach  P., Gamain  J., Raphael  J. H., Ubbink  D. T.
ISSN
1078-5884 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
09/2003
Volume
26
Number
3
Pages
280-6
Notes
Journal Article
Multicenter Study --- Old month value: Sep
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on limb survival in patients with non-reconstructable critical leg ischaemia, and the value of patient selection on the basis of transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcpO2) measurements and trial screening. DESIGN: A prospective, controlled, European multicentre study. METHODS: Non-reconstructable patients with stable critical leg ischaemia were divided into three groups. The SCS-Match group comprised patients with a baseline forefoot TcpO2 of < 30 mmHg and both sufficient pain relief and sufficient paraesthesia coverage (> 75%) after a test stimulation period of at least 72 h. If baseline TcpO2 was < 10 mmHg, the TcpO2 should have exceeded 20 mmHg after test stimulation. The SCS-Match group was compared with patients not meeting these criteria, who were treated either with SCS (SCS-No-Match) or without SCS (No-SCS). RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (+/- SD) supine TcpO2 was 14.9 +/- 8.3 mmHg in the SCS-Match group (n = 41), 11.3 +/- 13.3 mmHg in the SCS-No-Match group (n = 32) and 15.3 +/- 17.1 mmHg in the No-SCS group (n = 39). In the SCS-Match group a significant improvement in pain relief (p < 0.005) and TcpO2 (p < 0.001) was seen. After 12 months, cumulative limb survival of patients treated with SCS was significantly better than that of patients not treated with SCS (p < 0.03), and limb survival in the SCS-Match group was significantly higher (p < 0.03) than that in the SCS-No-Match and No-SCS groups (78, 55 and 45%, respectively). CONCLUSION: SCS treatment of non-reconstructable critical leg ischaemia provides a significantly better limb survival rate compared with conservative treatment. Patient selection based on TcpO2 and the results of trial screening further increase the probability of limb survival after SCS therapy.
Keywords
Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous Critical Illness *Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods Female Humans Ischemia/blood/*therapy Leg/*blood supply Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies Spinal Cord
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
28/01/2008 10:17
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:21
Usage data