Whole-body strength training using a Huber Motion Lab in coronary heart disease patients: safety, tolerance, fuel selection, and energy expenditure aspects and optimization

Details

Ressource 1Request a copy Sous embargo indéterminé.
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_B0DB9346AE37
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Whole-body strength training using a Huber Motion Lab in coronary heart disease patients: safety, tolerance, fuel selection, and energy expenditure aspects and optimization
Journal
Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Author(s)
Guiraud T., Labrunee M., Pillard F., Granger R., Bousquet M., Richard L., Boned A., Pathak A., Gayda M., Gremeaux V.
ISSN
1537-7385 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0894-9115
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2015
Volume
94
Number
5
Pages
385-94
Language
english
Notes
Guiraud, Thibaut
Labrunee, Marc
Pillard, Fabien
Granger, Richard
Bousquet, Marc
Richard, Lisa
Boned, Anne
Pathak, Atul
Gayda, Mathieu
Gremeaux, Vincent
eng
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;94(5):385-94. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000181.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate safety, tolerance, relative exercise intensity, and muscle substrate oxidation during sessions performed on a Huber Motion Lab in coronary heart disease patients. DESIGN: After an assessment of Vo2 peak, 20 coronary heart disease patients participated in two different exercises performed in random order at 40% and 70% (W40 and W70) of the maximal isometric voluntary contraction. RESULTS: No significant arrhythmia or abnormal blood pressure responses occurred during either session, and no muscle soreness was reported within 48 hrs posttest. The authors found a difference between W40 and W70 sessions for mean (standard deviation) ventilation (25.1% [8%] and 32.1% [9%] of maximal ventilation, respectively; P = 0.04) and a small difference for mean (standard deviation) heart rate (73 [7] and 79 [8] beats/min, respectively; P < 0.01). When compared with the W40, the W70 was associated with higher active energy expenditure (2.4 [0.6] and 3.1 [0.9] Kcal/min, respectively; P < 0.0001) and a similar mean (standard deviation) oxygen uptake (5.5 [1] and 6.6 [1] ml/min per kilogram, respectively; P = 0.07). The qualitative percentages of carbohydrates and lipids oxidized were 71% and 29%, respectively, at W40 and 91% and 9%, respectively, at W70. CONCLUSIONS: Both protocols, which consisted of repeating 6-sec phases of contractions with 10 secs of passive recovery on the Huber Motion Lab, seemed to be well tolerated, safe, and feasible in this group of coronary heart disease patients.
Keywords
Coronary Disease/*physiopathology/*rehabilitation, *Energy Metabolism, *Exercise Tolerance, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Strength, Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism, Oxygen Consumption, Resistance Training/*classification/*methods
Pubmed
Create date
26/11/2019 12:35
Last modification date
04/05/2020 7:06
Usage data