Purpose of Review This paper aims to revisit and critically analyse the definitions of impulsive actions, challenging the
traditional focus on negative outcomes and dysfunctionality. By shifting the discussion away from an exclusive association
with dysfunctionality, it advocates for a more nuanced examination of rapid actions undertaken with minimal forethought,
potentially uncovering overlooked adaptive qualities and situational benefits.
Recent Findings Empirical evidence and formal models challenge the notion that impulsive actions are inherently maladaptive.
Instead, these studies suggest that the context and environment play crucial roles in determining whether such actions
are or not adaptive.
Summary This paper proposes a new perspective on impulsive actions. Impulsive actions are rapid because not all available
evidence is considered, but this does not necessarily result in negative outcomes. Future research should focus on developing
modified impulsivity measures that reflect this viewpoint. Such measures could provide deeper insights into the nuances of
psychopathological symptoms and disordered behaviours.