Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_A9507A5CA56B
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes.
Journal
Nature Reviews. Cancer
Author(s)
Vaughan S., Coward J.I., Bast R.C., Berchuck A., Berek J.S., Brenton J.D., Coukos G., Crum C.C., Drapkin R., Etemadmoghadam D., Friedlander M., Gabra H., Kaye S.B., Lord C.J., Lengyel E., Levine D.A., McNeish I.A., Menon U., Mills G.B., Nephew K.P., Oza A.M., Sood A.K., Stronach E.A., Walczak H., Bowtell D.D., Balkwill F.R.
ISSN
1474-1768 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1474-175X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Volume
11
Number
10
Pages
719-725
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Consensus Development Conference ; Guideline ; Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
There have been major advances in our understanding of the cellular and molecular biology of the human malignancies that are collectively referred to as ovarian cancer. At a recent Helene Harris Memorial Trust meeting, an international group of researchers considered actions that should be taken to improve the outcome for women with ovarian cancer. Nine major recommendations are outlined in this Opinion article.
Keywords
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Health Planning Guidelines, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy, Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
14/10/2014 11:43
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:13
Usage data