Which lumen is the source of catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients with multi-lumen central venous catheters?
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A2EFEE2E9324
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Which lumen is the source of catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients with multi-lumen central venous catheters?
Journal
Infection
ISSN
1439-0973 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0300-8126
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
41
Number
1
Pages
49-52
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Paired blood cultures, drawn from the catheter and a peripheral vein, used for calculation of the differential time to positivity (DTP), have been proposed for the detection of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). The most relevant catheter lumen to be sampled in multi-lumen central venous catheters (CVCs) has not been recommended.
Forty-four febrile neutropaenic patients, following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and with multi-lumen CVCs in place, were investigated using the DTP method of blood samples drawn from every lumen of the CVC and a peripheral vein.
Twelve of 44 patients (27 %) had CRBSIs, as determined by the DTP method. In 10 of 12 (83 %) febrile neutropaenic patients, after HSCT, CRBSIs originated from the CVC lumen used for parenteral nutrition and blood products only. 17 % had CRBSI originating from the other CVC lumen (p = 0.039).
In most patients, CRBSIs originated from the CVC lumen used for parenteral nutrition and blood products, indicating that this lumen is the main source of CRBSI. However, since 17 % of patients had CRBSIs originating from another lumen, each lumen of multi-lumen CVCs has to be considered as a potential source of CRBSI and should, ideally, be sampled in order to avoid failure in diagnostic procedures.
Forty-four febrile neutropaenic patients, following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and with multi-lumen CVCs in place, were investigated using the DTP method of blood samples drawn from every lumen of the CVC and a peripheral vein.
Twelve of 44 patients (27 %) had CRBSIs, as determined by the DTP method. In 10 of 12 (83 %) febrile neutropaenic patients, after HSCT, CRBSIs originated from the CVC lumen used for parenteral nutrition and blood products only. 17 % had CRBSI originating from the other CVC lumen (p = 0.039).
In most patients, CRBSIs originated from the CVC lumen used for parenteral nutrition and blood products, indicating that this lumen is the main source of CRBSI. However, since 17 % of patients had CRBSIs originating from another lumen, each lumen of multi-lumen CVCs has to be considered as a potential source of CRBSI and should, ideally, be sampled in order to avoid failure in diagnostic procedures.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Bacteremia/diagnosis, Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis, Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects, Female, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neutropenia
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
02/12/2024 17:50
Last modification date
04/12/2024 8:07