A temporal hierarchy for conspecific vocalization discrimination in humans.
Details
Download: 11210.full.pdf (2354.81 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_9F518A641EC2
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A temporal hierarchy for conspecific vocalization discrimination in humans.
Journal
The Journal of neuroscience
ISSN
1529-2401 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0270-6474
Publication state
Published
Issued date
18/08/2010
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
30
Number
33
Pages
11210-11221
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The ability to discriminate conspecific vocalizations is observed across species and early during development. However, its neurophysiologic mechanism remains controversial, particularly regarding whether it involves specialized processes with dedicated neural machinery. We identified spatiotemporal brain mechanisms for conspecific vocalization discrimination in humans by applying electrical neuroimaging analyses to auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in response to acoustically and psychophysically controlled nonverbal human and animal vocalizations as well as sounds of man-made objects. AEP strength modulations in the absence of topographic modulations are suggestive of statistically indistinguishable brain networks. First, responses were significantly stronger, but topographically indistinguishable to human versus animal vocalizations starting at 169-219 ms after stimulus onset and within regions of the right superior temporal sulcus and superior temporal gyrus. This effect correlated with another AEP strength modulation occurring at 291-357 ms that was localized within the left inferior prefrontal and precentral gyri. Temporally segregated and spatially distributed stages of vocalization discrimination are thus functionally coupled and demonstrate how conventional views of functional specialization must incorporate network dynamics. Second, vocalization discrimination is not subject to facilitated processing in time, but instead lags more general categorization by approximately 100 ms, indicative of hierarchical processing during object discrimination. Third, although differences between human and animal vocalizations persisted when analyses were performed at a single-object level or extended to include additional (man-made) sound categories, at no latency were responses to human vocalizations stronger than those to all other categories. Vocalization discrimination transpires at times synchronous with that of face discrimination but is not functionally specialized.
Keywords
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Animals, Auditory Perception/physiology, Brain/physiology, Brain Mapping, Discrimination (Psychology)/physiology, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways/physiology, Neuropsychological Tests, Sound Spectrography, Species Specificity, Speech, Speech Perception/physiology, Time Factors, Vocalization, Animal, Young Adult
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
14/09/2010 10:23
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:05