Readiness to Change Predicts Drinking: Findings from 12-Month Follow-Up of Alcohol Use Disorder Outpatients.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_9D905135B8F7
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Readiness to Change Predicts Drinking: Findings from 12-Month Follow-Up of Alcohol Use Disorder Outpatients.
Journal
Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)
ISSN
1464-3502 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0735-0414
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
52
Number
1
Pages
65-71
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: ARTICLE
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication types: Journal Article ; Observational Study
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication types: Journal Article ; Observational Study
Abstract
To test whether measures of readiness to change (RTC) re-assessed every 3 months had predictive value for change in alcohol use over 12 months in a sample of adult outpatients with alcohol use disorder (AUD).
Of the case, 78 outpatients were followed monthly over one year and averaged 9.0 interviews each (total observations = 704). Alcohol abstinence days and heavy drinking days were assessed monthly using a 30-day timeline follow-back procedure. RTC was assessed using 3 'readiness rulers' (importance, readiness, and confidence to change, measured on a 0-10 visual analog scale). The effect of RTC on alcohol use over time was tested every 3 months using negative binomial generalized estimating equations (GEE), controlling for gender, age, baseline alcohol dependence severity and AUD treatment status (ongoing vs. ceased).
GEE models showed highly significant effects of readiness and confidence to change on respective alcohol outcomes. Effects of importance to change were weaker.
As hypothesized, higher RTC scores were associated with improved alcohol use outcomes in this longitudinal study. The strongest effects were for confidence to change. Finding significant predictive validity prospectively is consistent with a theoretical view of RTC as a dynamic construct. Further research might clarify how AUD treatment could actually elicit or increase RTC.
Of the case, 78 outpatients were followed monthly over one year and averaged 9.0 interviews each (total observations = 704). Alcohol abstinence days and heavy drinking days were assessed monthly using a 30-day timeline follow-back procedure. RTC was assessed using 3 'readiness rulers' (importance, readiness, and confidence to change, measured on a 0-10 visual analog scale). The effect of RTC on alcohol use over time was tested every 3 months using negative binomial generalized estimating equations (GEE), controlling for gender, age, baseline alcohol dependence severity and AUD treatment status (ongoing vs. ceased).
GEE models showed highly significant effects of readiness and confidence to change on respective alcohol outcomes. Effects of importance to change were weaker.
As hypothesized, higher RTC scores were associated with improved alcohol use outcomes in this longitudinal study. The strongest effects were for confidence to change. Finding significant predictive validity prospectively is consistent with a theoretical view of RTC as a dynamic construct. Further research might clarify how AUD treatment could actually elicit or increase RTC.
Keywords
Adult, Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis, Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Outpatients/psychology, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Time Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
05/08/2016 16:30
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:03