Diagnostic performance of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for detection of primary lesion and staging of endometrial cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_9D64F79C6A3F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Diagnostic performance of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for detection of primary lesion and staging of endometrial cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
Journal
International journal of gynecological cancer
ISSN
1525-1438 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1048-891X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
23
Number
9
Pages
1536-1543
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) imaging has been used for staging of endometrial cancer. In the current study, we systematically searched the available literature on the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET imaging for staging of endometrial cancer.
PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Knowledge, Science Direct, and Springer were searched using "endometr* AND PET" as the search terms. All studies evaluating the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in the staging of endometrial carcinoma were included. Statistical pooling of diagnostic accuracy indices was done using random-effects model. Cochrane Q test and I(2) index were used for heterogeneity evaluation.
Sixteen studies (807 patients in total) were included in the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of the primary lesions were 81.8% (77.9%-85.3%) and 89.8% (79.2%-96.2%); for lymph node staging were 72.3% (63.8%-79.8%) and 92.9% (90.6%-94.8%); and for distant metastasis detection were 95.7% (85.5%-99.5%) and 95.4% (92.7%-97.3%).
Because of low sensitivity, diagnostic utility of (18)F-FDG PET imaging is limited in primary tumor detection and lymph node staging of endometrial cancer patients. However, high specificities ensure high positive predictive values in these 2 indications. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET imaging is much better in detection of distant metastases. Larger studies with better design are needed to draw any more definite conclusion.
PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Knowledge, Science Direct, and Springer were searched using "endometr* AND PET" as the search terms. All studies evaluating the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in the staging of endometrial carcinoma were included. Statistical pooling of diagnostic accuracy indices was done using random-effects model. Cochrane Q test and I(2) index were used for heterogeneity evaluation.
Sixteen studies (807 patients in total) were included in the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of the primary lesions were 81.8% (77.9%-85.3%) and 89.8% (79.2%-96.2%); for lymph node staging were 72.3% (63.8%-79.8%) and 92.9% (90.6%-94.8%); and for distant metastasis detection were 95.7% (85.5%-99.5%) and 95.4% (92.7%-97.3%).
Because of low sensitivity, diagnostic utility of (18)F-FDG PET imaging is limited in primary tumor detection and lymph node staging of endometrial cancer patients. However, high specificities ensure high positive predictive values in these 2 indications. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET imaging is much better in detection of distant metastases. Larger studies with better design are needed to draw any more definite conclusion.
Keywords
Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology, Female, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging, Lymphatic Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging/methods, Positron-Emission Tomography, Sensitivity and Specificity
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
20/08/2017 19:56
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:03