Perceived fairness as main determinant of patients' satisfaction with care during psychiatric hospitalisation: An observational study.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_98803B5A7460
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Perceived fairness as main determinant of patients' satisfaction with care during psychiatric hospitalisation: An observational study.
Journal
International journal of law and psychiatry
ISSN
1873-6386 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0160-2527
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
82
Pages
101793
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Observational Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Patient satisfaction with care is widely recognized as one of the most important indicator of quality in mental health care. It can impact several treatment outcomes, such as treatment adherence and engagement with services. At the same time, as an outcome in itself, satisfaction with care is also affected by several factors, first and foremost by being coerced. The main aim of this study was to test if perceiving treatment pressures as fair and effective could positively impact patient satisfaction, even more than formal coercive measures.
Globally, 133 voluntary and involuntary inpatients were interviewed. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, including history of previous experiences of formal coercion and legal status of the hospitalisation, were collected through a structured questionnaire and medical charts. The participants were also asked to complete the Index of Fairness and Index of Effectiveness tools as well as a structured questionnaire on satisfaction with care. Simple and multiple linear regressions were performed.
Although several factors were found to affect satisfaction with care when taken independently, perceived fairness was the stronger predictor of both satisfaction with treatment (β =.234; p = .022) and satisfaction with decision-making involvement (β =.360; p < .001) when controlling for confounders.
Our results point to the paramount importance of developing and implementing interventions that promote procedural fairness in psychiatric treatment and thereby improve patient satisfaction while reducing the risk of disengagement with care.
Globally, 133 voluntary and involuntary inpatients were interviewed. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, including history of previous experiences of formal coercion and legal status of the hospitalisation, were collected through a structured questionnaire and medical charts. The participants were also asked to complete the Index of Fairness and Index of Effectiveness tools as well as a structured questionnaire on satisfaction with care. Simple and multiple linear regressions were performed.
Although several factors were found to affect satisfaction with care when taken independently, perceived fairness was the stronger predictor of both satisfaction with treatment (β =.234; p = .022) and satisfaction with decision-making involvement (β =.360; p < .001) when controlling for confounders.
Our results point to the paramount importance of developing and implementing interventions that promote procedural fairness in psychiatric treatment and thereby improve patient satisfaction while reducing the risk of disengagement with care.
Keywords
Coercion, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Mental Disorders/psychology, Mental Disorders/therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Perceived effectiveness, Perceived fairness, Psychiatric hospitalisation, Satisfaction with care
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/04/2022 7:55
Last modification date
21/11/2022 8:21