Comparison between fast-interrupted steady-state (FISS) and rapid water-excitation pulses for fat signal suppression in free-running whole-heart MRI at 1.5 T.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_9758559B8446
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparison between fast-interrupted steady-state (FISS) and rapid water-excitation pulses for fat signal suppression in free-running whole-heart MRI at 1.5 T.
Journal
Magma
Author(s)
Safarkhanlo Y., Yerly J., Falcão MBL, Mackowiak ALC, Piccini D., Stuber M., Jung B., Gräni C., Bastiaansen JAM
ISSN
1352-8661 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0968-5243
Publication state
In Press
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Abstract
Free-running whole-heart MRI using balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequences offer high SNR and myocardial tissue contrast. However, an inadequate fat signal suppression may introduce artifacts and is particularly challenging with non-Cartesian readouts. The aim of this study was to evaluate different fat-signal suppression methods for whole-heart free-running MRI at 1.5 T using numerical simulations, phantom, and cardiac MRI experiments without the use of contrast agents.
Binomial off-resonant rectangular (BORR), lipid insensitive binomial off-resonant RF excitation (LIBRE), and lipid insensitive binomial off-resonant (LIBOR) pulses were implemented within a 3D radial bSSFP sequence. Their pulse parameters were optimized for fat signal suppression at 1.5 T using simulations and phantom experiments. Optimized protocols, along with a free-running fast interrupted steady-state (FISS) and non-fat suppressed bSSFP sequence, were used to acquire phantom and cardiac data in five volunteers. SAR values were recorded. The SNR and CNR <sub>Water-Fat</sub> were measured in phantom data, while SNR and CNR <sub>Blood-Myocardium</sub> were quantified in volunteers using reconstruction without motion correction. Motion-resolved reconstructions were used for qualitative assessments. Statistical differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.
LIBOR had the highest CNR <sub>Water-Fat</sub> (276.8 ± 2.5) in phantoms, followed by LIBRE (268.1 ± 2.6), BORR (249.9 ± 2.2), and FISS (212.7 ± 2.7), though these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In volunteers, BORR had the highest SNR in the ventricular blood pool (17.0 ± 1.5), and LIBRE had the highest CNR <sub>Blood-Fat</sub> (29.4 ± 9.3). FISS had the highest CNR <sub>Blood-Myocardium</sub> (29.0 ± 8.9), but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Motion-resolved cardiac imaging showed comparable quality across all fat-suppressed sequences, with no significant streaking artifacts observed. Free-running bSSFP with LIBOR required the lowest SAR, up to a sixfold decrease compared with FISS.
The tested sequences performed similarly in SNR and CNR but LIBOR offered the lowest SAR, making it a promising candidate for applications where RF energy deposition is a concern.
Keywords
1.5 t, 5D whole-heart free-running CMR, Fiss, Fat suppression, Libre, Off-resonance, bSSFP, 1.5 T, FISS, LIBRE
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
27/06/2025 14:22
Last modification date
28/06/2025 7:04
Usage data