Predictors for Vulnerable Plaque in Functionally Significant Lesions.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_957200B1EB09
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Predictors for Vulnerable Plaque in Functionally Significant Lesions.
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
Author(s)
Yang S., Hwang D., Sakai K., Mizukami T., Leipsic J., Belmonte M., Sonck J., Nørgaard B.L., Otake H., Ko B., Maeng M., Møller Jensen J., Buytaert D., Munhoz D., Andreini D., Ohashi H., Shinke T., Taylor C.A., Barbato E., De Bruyne B., Collet C., Koo B.K.
ISSN
1876-7591 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1876-7591
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Number
2
Pages
195-206
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Observational Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Vulnerable plaque presents prognostic implications in addition to functional significance.
The aim of this study was to identify relevant features of vulnerable plaque in functionally significant lesions.
In this multicenter, prospective study conducted across 5 countries, including patients who had invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80, a total of 95 patients with available pullback pressure gradient (PPG) and plaque analysis on coronary computed tomographic angiography and optical coherence tomography were analyzed. Vulnerable plaque was defined as the presence of plaque rupture or thin-cap fibroatheroma on optical coherence tomography. Among the 25 clinical characteristics, invasive angiographic findings, physiological indexes, and coronary computed tomographic angiographic findings, significant predictors of vulnerable plaque were identified.
Mean percentage diameter stenosis, FFR, and PPG were 77.8% ± 14.6%, 0.66 ± 0.13, and 0.65 ± 0.13, respectively. Vulnerable plaque was present in 53 lesions (55.8%). PPG and FFR were identified as significant predictors of vulnerable plaque (P < 0.05 for all). PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 were significantly related to a higher probability of vulnerable plaque after adjustment for each other (OR: 6.75 [95% CI: 2.39-19.1]; P < 0.001] for PPG >0.65; OR: 4.61 [95% CI: 1.66-12.8]; P = 0.003 for FFR ≤0.70). When categorizing lesions according to combined PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, the prevalence of vulnerable plaque was 20.0%, 57.1%, 66.7%, and 88.2% in the order of PPG ≤0.65 and FFR >0.70, PPG ≤0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, PPG >0.65 and FFR >0.70, and PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 (P for trend < 0.001), respectively.
Among low-FFR lesions, the presence of vulnerable plaque can be predicted by PPG combined with FFR without additional anatomical or plaque characteristics. (Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan [P3] Study; NCT03782688).
Keywords
Humans, Plaque, Atherosclerotic, Male, Female, Prospective Studies, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Coronary Angiography/methods, Rupture, Spontaneous, Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Artery Disease/pathology, Coronary Artery Disease/therapy, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Computed Tomography Angiography, Aged, Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Vessels/physiopathology, Coronary Vessels/pathology, Risk Factors, Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology, Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Stenosis/therapy, Coronary Stenosis/pathology, Severity of Illness Index, Prognosis, Cardiac Catheterization, Europe, Fibrosis, fractional flow reserve, myocardial ischemia, plaque rupture, pullback pressure gradients, thin-cap fibroatheroma
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
20/09/2024 16:10
Last modification date
17/05/2025 7:09
Usage data