Differentiating separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases with emphasis on pathological and molecular considerations: Recommendations from the IASLC Pathology Committee.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_906C6D77BFB1
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Differentiating separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases with emphasis on pathological and molecular considerations: Recommendations from the IASLC Pathology Committee.
Journal
Journal of thoracic oncology
Working group(s)
IASLC Pathology Committee
ISSN
1556-1380 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1556-0864
Publication state
In Press
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Abstract
With the implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, multiple pulmonary tumor nodules (MPTN) are diagnosed with increasing frequency and the selection of surgical treatments versus systemic therapies has become challenging on a daily basis in clinical practice. In the presence of multiple carcinomas, especially adenocarcinomas, pathologically determined to be of pulmonary origin, the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is important for staging, management, and prognostication.
We systemically reviewed various means that aid in the differentiation between SPLCs and IPMs explored by histopathologic evaluation and molecular profiling, the latter includes DNA microsatellite analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization, TP53 and oncogenic driver mutation testing and, more recently, with promising effectiveness, next-generation sequencing (NGS) comprising small- or large-scale multi-gene panels.
Comprehensive histologic evaluation may suffice to differentiate between SPLCs and IPMs. However, molecular profiling using larger-scale NGS typically provides superior discriminatory power, allowing for more accurate classification. Based on the literature review and expert opinions, we proposed a combined 4-step histologic and molecular classification algorithm for addressing MPTN of adenocarcinoma histology that encourages a multidisciplinary approach. It is also noteworthy that new technologies combining machine learning and digital pathology may develop into valuable diagnostic tools for distinguishing SPLCs from IPMs in the future.
Although histopathologic evaluation is often adequate to differentiate SPLCs from IPMs, molecular profiling should be performed when possible, especially in cases with tumors exhibiting similar morphology. This manuscript summarized the previous efforts in resolving the current challenges and highlighted the recent progress in the differentiation methods and algorithms used in categorizing multiple lung adenocarcinomas into SPLCs or IPMs, which are becoming more and more critical in precision lung cancer management.
We systemically reviewed various means that aid in the differentiation between SPLCs and IPMs explored by histopathologic evaluation and molecular profiling, the latter includes DNA microsatellite analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization, TP53 and oncogenic driver mutation testing and, more recently, with promising effectiveness, next-generation sequencing (NGS) comprising small- or large-scale multi-gene panels.
Comprehensive histologic evaluation may suffice to differentiate between SPLCs and IPMs. However, molecular profiling using larger-scale NGS typically provides superior discriminatory power, allowing for more accurate classification. Based on the literature review and expert opinions, we proposed a combined 4-step histologic and molecular classification algorithm for addressing MPTN of adenocarcinoma histology that encourages a multidisciplinary approach. It is also noteworthy that new technologies combining machine learning and digital pathology may develop into valuable diagnostic tools for distinguishing SPLCs from IPMs in the future.
Although histopathologic evaluation is often adequate to differentiate SPLCs from IPMs, molecular profiling should be performed when possible, especially in cases with tumors exhibiting similar morphology. This manuscript summarized the previous efforts in resolving the current challenges and highlighted the recent progress in the differentiation methods and algorithms used in categorizing multiple lung adenocarcinomas into SPLCs or IPMs, which are becoming more and more critical in precision lung cancer management.
Keywords
Adenocarcinomas, Histopathology, Intrapulmonary metastases, Multiple pulmonary tumor nodules, Next generation sequencing, Separate primary lung carcinomas
Pubmed
Create date
25/11/2024 15:51
Last modification date
26/11/2024 7:05