Less strict intervention thresholds for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX predict clinical fractures in osteopenic postmenopausal women with no prior fractures.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_8B5479B577B3
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Less strict intervention thresholds for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX predict clinical fractures in osteopenic postmenopausal women with no prior fractures.
Journal
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism
ISSN
1435-5604 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0914-8779
Publication state
Published
Issued date
09/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
36
Number
5
Pages
580-588
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Little is known about the clinical relevance of treating post-menopausal women with no prior history of fragility fracture and bone mineral densities (BMD) within the osteopenic range. In recent years, in addition to BMD and FRAX fracture probability assessments, a surrogate measure of bone micro-architecture quality, called the trabecular bone score (TBS), has been proven to predict future fragility fractures independently of both BMD and the FRAX. In this retrospective analysis of a follow-up study, we compared three risk assessment instruments-the FRAX, the TBS, and a TBS-adjusted FRAX score-in their ability, to predict future fragility fractures over a minimum of five years of follow-up among post-menopausal osteopenic women with no prior fragility fractures. We also sought to determine if more- versus less-stringent criteria were better when stratifying patients into higher-risk patients warranting osteoporosis-targeted intervention versus lower-risk patients in whom intervention would usually be deemed unnecessary. Over a mean 5.2 years follow-up, 18 clinical fragility fractures were documented among 127 women in the age 50 years and older (mean age = 66.1). On multivariate analysis utilizing regression models and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, less-stringent criteria for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX were capable of predicting future fractures (with sensitivity/specificity of 83/31; 39/77 and 78/50% for TBS, FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX, respectively), while more-stringent criteria were incapable of doing so (with sensitivity/specificity of 56/60; 39/77 and 39/74 for TBS, FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX, respectively). Neither TBS threshold alone was a significant predictor of future fracture in our study. However, hazard ratio analysis revealed slight superiority of the TBS-adjusted FRAX over the FRAX alone (HR = 3.09 vs. 2.79). Adjusting the FRAX tool by incorporating the TBS may be useful to optimize the detection of post-menopausal osteopenic women with no prior fractures who warrant osteoporosis-targeted therapy.
Keywords
Aged, Bone Diseases, Metabolic/complications, Bone Diseases, Metabolic/pathology, Cancellous Bone/pathology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fractures, Bone/complications, Fractures, Bone/pathology, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Postmenopause/physiology, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, FRAX, TBS-adjusted FRAX, Thresholds, Trabecular bone score (TBS)
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
28/09/2017 8:36
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:50